Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:04:55 -0700
- From: Alma Garcia <almag at mills dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
Thanks for pointing that out. But, all the work you do to create and modify a load table is still in the character based interface, not in Millennium.
Alma
________________________________________
From: innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org [innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org] On Behalf Of Joe Reimers [jreimers at nd dot edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 5:35 AM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
According to the Sierra intro given at the IUG meeting this year, Innovative said that load tables will transfer from Millennium to Sierra, so at least that portion will remain valid.
-Joe Reimers
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org [mailto:innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org] On Behalf Of said shafik
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:23 AM
To: innopac at innovativeusers dot org
Subject: Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
One of the mysteries, to me at least, is whether the new Sierra System is going to include same Millennium back-ends such as load tables and other stuff? Or will it have a different approaches since it is adopting the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) concepts? If someone plans to go to any back-end training it is better to be clear on whether what is in that training could be applied if the library chooses to acquire Sierra.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Said Shafik
MSLIS
Library Systems Manager
Drexel University Libraries
Philadelphia, PA 19104-2875
Phone: 215.895.1832
Fax: 215.895.2070
http://library.drexel.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> From: jreimers at nd dot edu
> To: innopac at innovativeusers dot org
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:47:56 -0400
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
>
> One thing I would add to this discussion is that in addition to letting you create (and edit!) load tables, I've found that the training also gave me a much, much deeper understanding of what's going on inside the system, as well as a feel for how to manipulate that knowledge to your particular needs. Each institution has its own needs, but in our case, our training has long since paid for itself. My opinion is that if you're thinking about doing it, it would probably be highly worthwhile.
>
> As an aside on that, our institution has two people trained on load profiles, and I think that has proved highly beneficial. Having a second pair of eyes on-site that understands what you're trying to do and in what context you're trying to do it makes troubleshooting much, much easier.
> -Joe Reimers
> Notre Dame Kresge Law Library
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org
> [mailto:innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org] On Behalf Of Bob Duncan
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 4:24 PM
> To: IUG INNOPAC List
> Subject: Re: [IUG] Load Profile Training
>
> At 02:59 PM 6/6/2011, Mike Pullin wrote:
> >I would like to find out what institutions have done concerning Load
> >Profile Training with Innovative. If you have taken it, what has it
> >given you, and if you have not, have you found the material in other
> >places. (Of course I realize that if you have not taken it, you may
> >not know what material you would have gotten had you taken it.)
>
> Unless Innovative has changed their policy, the one very important thing you get is the ability to add and edit load profiles -- I was under the impression that at least one person at a library has to take the training or the ability to create/edit profiles will not be available?
>
> Bob Duncan
>
>
> ~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~
> Robert E. Duncan
> Systems Librarian
> Lafayette College
> Easton, PA 18042
> duncanr at lafayette dot edu
> http://library.lafayette.edu/
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list Public replies: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org You are currently subscribed to innopac as: jreimers at nd dot edu dot
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
> INNOPAC list Public replies: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org You are
> currently subscribed to innopac as: saidshafik at hotmail dot com dot
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
You are currently subscribed to innopac as: jreimers at nd dot edu dot
Update your subscription options: http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
You are currently subscribed to innopac as: almag at mills dot edu dot
Update your subscription options: http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.