Re: [IUG] Automating MARC record output via Millennium ?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:38:41 -0400
- From: Bob Duncan <duncanr at lafayette dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [IUG] Automating MARC record output via Millennium ?
At 12:25 AM 4/6/2011, Mark wrote:
REP-2 did poorly in the voting. It's
a pity relative date searching was buried in
with something unrelated. You had to read
REP-2 carefully to find it.
If III are alert they might realise this enhancement
- even though it scored poorly - could sell more
Scheduler licenses. Hopefully they factor this
in as well as the voting.
Innovative is very alert, and I think that if they based their
product development purely on the results of the IUG enhancements
process voting, we'd all be using a different system because they
would have gone out of business long long ago. AFAICT, if a request
is doable and implementing it fits III's business model and their
product vision, it'll make it into the programming regardless of its
place in a popularity poll. (And vice versa -- the tippy top vote
getter every year for a decade won't be implemented it if it doesn't
fit the model and vision.)
Robert E. Duncan
Easton, PA 18042
duncanr at lafayette dot edu
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.