Re: [IUG] Alternative IDs implementation

["Fifarek, Aimee" <afifarek at scottsdaleaz dot gov>]

Hi Sue - I don't think we made any special provisions for indexing,
however I am able to pull up my record by my alt ID using the barcode
index so I'm guessing that that is the default.  That would make sense
since the alt ID is also the alias. -- Aimee

Aimee Fifarek
Scottsdale Public Library
480-312-7060
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org] On Behalf Of Sue Whitehead
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:16 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: [IUG] Alternative IDs implementation

Hi, Aimee,

In your system, is the Alternate ID indexed in the same index as the
regular
ID, or a separate index, or not indexed at all?

We also have been thinking about adding the Alternate ID, and would
appreciate any advice about the indexing question.

Sincerely,

Sue Whitehead
Systems Librarian
Biola University Library


On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:55 PM, IUG INNOPAC List <
innopac at innovativeusers dot org> wrote:

>  Emily - we're a public, so you may want to do something different
from
> us, but we just activated the field in Modify Patron info and in our
> Patron Self Registration form and advertised the availability.  It's
> optional for our customers use.  We already have 7,000 customers with
> alternate ids and it's only been available since February.  It's so
much
> easier than remembering the library card number that people are happy
to
> have it.
>
> One note if you use the item slip/wrapper template for anything.  The
> system thinks of alt ID and alias as the same thing, so if you are
> printing customer name on anything it may change to the alt ID
> unexpectedly.  That's what happened to our self service hold slips.
We
> were able to use a different field in the wrapper template and get
back
> to displaying the real last name.
>
> -- Aimee
>
> Aimee Fifarek
> Scottsdale Public Library
> 480-312-7060
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org
>
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innovativeusers dot org<innopac-bounces at innovativeus
ers.org>]
> On Behalf Of Bullitt, Emily
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:31 PM
> To: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
> Subject: [IUG] Alternative IDs implementation
>
> Hello,
>
>
> We are planning to implement alternate IDs for our WebPac.  For those
of
> you that have implemented them, did you create a new patron load
profile
> to include the new field, or did you just let it get added to
individual
> records as patrons create their own alternate IDs?  Have you run up
> against problems if you didn't include it in the patron load profile?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
> Emily
>
>
> ---
>
> Emily Bullitt
>
> Manager, Information Desks
>
> Horn Library, Babson College
>
> (781) 239-5604
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
>
>


-- 
Sue Whitehead, x5611
Systems Librarian
Biola University

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.