Re: [IUG] Order of display in title searches on opac
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:09:25 -0500
- From: Blythe Kropf <blythekropf5 at gmail dot com>
- Subject: Re: [IUG] Order of display in title searches on opac
If I search the title as a key word, the records display in chronological
order.
Blythe
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Bob Duncan <duncanr at lafayette dot edu> wrote:
> At 09:01 AM 3/1/2010, Diane Leeson wrote:
>
>> We have been trying to work out how the Webpac puts search results into
>> order when you do a title search which results in various editions of
>> the same work being shown. One example on our catalogue
>> http://library.hull.ac.uk is to search for the title Research methods
>> for business students
>> . . .
>>
>> We cannot work out why the last one does not file in order, before the
>> 2009 ed. My interpretation of what the user manual says is that it
>> seems to indicate that when the same title appears the system puts them
>> in record number order (which should correspond to date if added as
>> published). However, this is not so for the above example since the
>> last record in the list has a number earlier than the 2009 edition.
>>
>
> Interesting. And the manual says that the default search is by title, but
> you'll note on the sample search you mention that if you choose the title
> sort from the sort drop-down, the records are sorted differently than the
> "system sorted" sort...which is supposedly by title.
>
> Bob Duncan
>
>
> ~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~
> Robert E. Duncan
> Systems Librarian
> Editor of IT Communications
> Lafayette College
> Easton, PA 18042
> duncanr at lafayette dot edu
> http://library.lafayette.edu/
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innovativeusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innovativeusers.org/iug-discussion-list
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---