[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 09:06:18 -0800
- From: David Meyer <dmeyer at ucsc dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [IUG] CJK Diacritics in Millennium
I can do searches using CJK in our catalog. I don't recall having to do
anything in particular, although I remember our Asian materials
cataloger couldn't enter CJK in the Millennium client until she upgraded
her Java from 1.4.x to the latest 1.5.x. What version of Java are you
using on your Millennium clients? And yes, you need to have special
indexing set up for the 880 fields in order for the transliterated
searches to work.
David
Boggs, John wrote:
Hi all,
One of my librarians has pointed out that we cannot search for Chinese
records using the actual Chinese characters - we need to use the PinYin
transliteration.
My first thought was that this might be an indexing issue - maybe we
need to specify that 880 fields are indexed, and ours aren't. In
perusing the manual, though, I come up with some contradictory
information. On one page it says "If your library has acquired the
ability to index diacritics..." But elsewhere it says simply, "A CJK
record can be retrieved using either CJK or romanized characters." So,
either you need to "acquire" something, or the system just does it,
depending on the page in the manual you're looking at. The FAQs on
CSDirect don't have an answer.
So I'm throwing this out to the list because I'm likely to get a quick
answer one way or the other: Is anybody out there in userland able to
search for Chinese records using Chinese characters, and if so, how did
you get it working?
John D. Boggs, PLAN Database Manager
Peninsula Library System
2471 Flores Street
San Mateo, CA 94403-2273
(650)571-6799 x3062
boggs at plsinfo dot org <blocked::mailto:boggs at plsinfo dot org>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac