[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I think you'll like it better. It does a better job of using available
material.

We use a paging priority, which is controlled through the Hold Pickup
Location table, set up with 3 levels in the hierarchy. Smallest
branches get paged first, then the regionals, then central. It's a way
that works for us to spread the load.

If you have specific questions, feel free to ask.

Thanks,

John Goodyear
ILS Analyst
Multnomah County Library
503.988.3229

-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Krimm, Debi
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:29 AM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: [IUG] Title-Level Paging


Soon we will be moving from item level paging to title-priority paging.
Any words of wisdom that you'd like to share, caution us about? Also,
for those of you that have multiple branches did you choose to setup the
Paging Priority table or let the system hold the paging randomly?


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac