[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Eeek. A typo: I meant 4-6 *weeks* not 4-6 months for processing.
And this thread did get started by someone wondering why *catalogers*
would want to tag. If catalogers have issues with controlled vocabs, then
tagging is probably not the solution. We have other avenues. I was under
the impression that the tagging option was originally created for patrons.
************
Diana Brooking (206) 685-0389
Cataloging Librarian (206) 685-8782 fax
Suzzallo Library dbrookin at u dot washington dot edu
University of Washington
Box 352900
Seattle WA 98195-2900
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, D. Brooking wrote:
There is a way libraries can propose updates and new terms to LCSH. It is
the SACO program. Please see:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/saco/saco.html
(SACO covers both LCSH and LC Classification. Libraries can apply to be a
"member" which I think takes a commitment of doing 10-12 proposals per
year.)
We (UW) will go ahead and make a change request to change "All terrain
cycling" to "Mountain biking" based on the overwhelming literary warrant
for the latter term.
LC does retain ultimate editorial control over LCSH, so this is just a
proposal, but we have lots of experience in SACO and we are pretty sure
this will fly. LC is pretty backlogged so it may take 4-6 months for this
to work its way through the editorial process. And this workload at LC is
another reason that LC isn't initiating many changes themselves.
So--change proposals have to come from the grass roots. Go for it.
Consider joining SACO, or find a library that is aleady in it that is
willing to help. Controlled vocabularies must be maintained in order to
remain useful and ultimately tagging individual bib records is not a
scalable solution.
************
Diana Brooking (206) 685-0389
Cataloging Librarian (206) 685-8782 fax
Suzzallo Library dbrookin at u dot washington dot edu
University of Washington
Box 352900
Seattle WA 98195-2900
---------- Forwarded message ----------
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Wynn, Stephen wrote:
I spoke last week about III's next-generation interface Encore, with
an
III rep who told me that whenever they do a demo, the catalogers
present
get very excited about the idea of adding tags in Encore. "They
just
can't wait to add 'mountain biking' to all of those records that
have
'All-terrain cycling,'" the rep said. In previous demos I had
gotten
the idea that tagging was a feature for the user, but this rep
specifically said that catalogers like the feature.
(For those who haven't seen a demo, this last refers to III's claim
that
users can't find books about mountain biking because the LCSH is
"All-terrain cycling." I've heard this example from three different
reps so it must be a house standard.)
As a cataloger I find this response baffling. The thought of
creating
and maintaining a nonstandard vocabulary ... well, it doesn't
exactly
fill me with joyful anticipation.
But I must be missing something. For those catalogers who anxiously
await the opportunity to tag your records in Encore (or who already
do
so),
What sorts of tags do you add?
Why do you prefer an Encore tag to an uncontrolled MARC tag?
Since "Mountain biking" is a SEE reference in the authority record
for
"All-terrain cycling," why do you need to add it as an Encore tag?
Do you plan to review all of your authority records for SEE
references
that could be usefully added as Encore tags?
Have you considered any automated methods of adding SEE references
as
Encore tags, in order to avoid the tedious and redundant manual work
that Encore reps advocate?
Stephen Wynn
Head of Technical Services and Systems
Pickler Memorial Library
Truman State University
Kirksville, MO 63501
(660) 785-4535
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac