Re: [IUG] RE: NOTHING compares ...

[Phil Shirley <phil at innovativeusers dot org>]

The IUG list is not moderated in the usual sense of the word.  In 
general*, subscribers can post directly to the list, and posts from 
non-subscribers get held for approval (most of these messages are spam). 
 Regarding the report of spam attached to a digest list: I haven't been 
subscribed to the digest recently but I've just re-activated my digest 
subscription so that I can see what's going on.  I would appreciate 
hearing (privately) from anyone who has received a digest message with 
spam in it, and it would be great if you could forward the message in 
question.  Please send these to:

innopac-owner at innopacusers dot org

*When I say that subscribers can post directly to the list, I mean that 
the list software compares the "from" address in an incoming post to the 
list of subscribers, and allows the post if it is in the list.  If the 
address you originally told the list to send your messages to and the 
"from" address are not the same, your messages will be held for 
approval.  If you're in this situation and you want to fix it, you'll 
have to un-subscribe and re-subscribe.  You can use this page:

http://www.innovativeusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac

or contact me if you would like help.  Also, some messages are held if 
the list thinks the message could be spam.

Phil
Phil Shirley, IUG list manager
phil at innovativeusers dot org

Zoltan Tomory wrote:
> Isn't this list moderated, or has a spammer advanced the art?  Anyhow,
> my Innopac digest had a spam attached to it.  If others also got it, we
> have a problem.
>
> Zoltan Tomory
> Missouri Botanical Garden
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac