[IUG] Re: Webpac Pro display problem

[Page Life <pagelife at email dot unc dot edu>]

Don, yes, absolutely right. I meant bib_display.html file #106854 (not briefcit.html file). Thanks. 
Page

Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:41:12 -0500
From: "Zhou, Don" <don dot zhou at wmitchell dot edu>
Subject: RE: [IUG] Re: Webpac Pro display problem
To: "IUG INNOPAC List" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>

Page,

That was a great suggestion. Is it briefcit.html or bib_display.html?

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Page Life
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:09 AM
To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
Subject: [IUG] Re: Webpac Pro display problem

Jean, as Don said, it might be duplicate lines in the webpub.def.
However, if that does not appear to be the problem, and if you have a
briefcit.html file operating in the staging area (assuming Webpac Pro
may be operating there), please check the two <--{recordinfo: ...}-->
lines in that file. The first will probably look something like
<--{recordinfo: a t e p r}-->  The 'r' would be the field tag for the
300 physical description field. If an 'r' appears in the first briefcit
'recordinfo' line (controlling what field tags appear above the holdings
box) and also in the second 'recordinfo' line (what field tags appear
below the holdings box), it might account for a duplicate display. A
duplicate display might also result from having two 'r' letters in one
of the two lines. Just suggestions based on trial-and-error findings
here.
Page Life
UNC-Chapel Hill

I am having a problem with the staging directory; the bib displays a
duplicate physical description. Any suggestions, I have looked at the
manual and do not seem to find the problem.
Jean Johnson 
Glenside Public Library District
25 E. Fullerton Ave.
Glendale Heights, IL 60139
630-260-1550 X319