RE: [IUG] Re: Webpac Pro display problem

["Zhou, Don" <don dot zhou at wmitchell dot edu>]

Page,

That was a great suggestion. Is it briefcit.html or bib_display.html?


Don

-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Page Life
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:09 AM
To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
Subject: [IUG] Re: Webpac Pro display problem

Jean, as Don said, it might be duplicate lines in the webpub.def.
However, if that does not appear to be the problem, and if you have a
briefcit.html file operating in the staging area (assuming Webpac Pro
may be operating there), please check the two <--{recordinfo: ...}-->
lines in that file. The first will probably look something like
<--{recordinfo: a t e p r}-->  The 'r' would be the field tag for the
300 physical description field. If an 'r' appears in the first briefcit
'recordinfo' line (controlling what field tags appear above the holdings
box) and also in the second 'recordinfo' line (what field tags appear
below the holdings box), it might account for a duplicate display. A
duplicate display might also result from having two 'r' letters in one
of the two lines. Just suggestions based on trial-and-error findings
here.
Page Life
UNC-Chapel Hill

I am having a problem with the staging directory; the bib displays a
duplicate physical description. Any suggestions, I have looked at the
manual and do not seem to find the problem.
Jean Johnson 
Glenside Public Library District
25 E. Fullerton Ave.
Glendale Heights, IL 60139
630-260-1550 X319



innopac-request at innopacusers dot org wrote:

>Send INNOPAC mailing list submissions to
>	innopac at innopacusers dot org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	innopac-request at innopacusers dot org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	innopac-owner at innopacusers dot org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of INNOPAC digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1.  What we really all need - Cross Stitch Logo for IUG 2007
>      (Seeman, Corey)
>   2. RE:  III self-check equipment recommendations (Mann, James H.)
>   3.  Webpac Pro display problem (Automation manager)
>   4.  Millennium Client Freezing Up (Beth Lunn)
>   5. Re:  Paging holds once they're unfrozen (Kathy Setter)
>   6. RE:  Proper transfer cable for a Percon PT2000 scanner?
>      (Maurine McCourry)
>   7. Re:  Paging holds once they're unfrozen (Carol Gyger)
>   8. Re:  III self-check equipment recommendations (Eeva Stierwalt)
>   9. RE:  Message 3: LibraryMetricks Print Managment and Library
>      Card (Davis, Gayle)
>  10. Re:  Something 'fun' for your Friday -- send
>      catalogrecordsviaSMS (Deb Bergeron)
>  11. Re:  Millennium Client Freezing Up (Randy Norwood)
>  12. RE:  Webpac Pro display problem (Zhou, Don)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 08:39:39 -0400
>From: "Seeman, Corey" <cseeman at bus dot umich dot edu>
>Subject: [IUG] What we really all need - Cross Stitch Logo for IUG
>	2007
>To: "IUG INNOPAC List" <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
>Message-ID:
>
<287E6049816A424488EAB4435A964BF202EC3CC1 at BUS-MAIL01 dot bus dot ads dot itcs dot umich dot 
edu>
>	
>Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii"
>
>Folks -- In case you missed the knitting/needlework group at IUG in San
>Jose, here is a very modest consolation gift.
> 
>I converted the beautiful logo for IUG 2007 (designed by Innovative's
>Dean Hunsaker) into cross stitch.
>
>So if you cannot get enough of the plums/prunes debate, you can now
>decorate your office/home with memories of IUG. 
>
>http://innovativeusers.org/programpages/IUG2007/iug-2007-cross-stitch
>
>Best -- Corey
>
>P.S. This is why Mieko wins awards.  She avoids work by answering list
>questions.  I do this!
> 
>Corey Seeman
>Director
>Kresge Business Administration Library
>Ross School of Business
>The University of Michigan
>cseeman at umich dot edu
>(734) 764-9969
>(734) 717-9734 (cell)
>(734) 764-3839 (fax)
> 
>Kresge Library Home Page: http://www.bus.umich.edu/kresgelibrary/
><http://www.bus.umich.edu/kresgelibrary/> 
>My home page: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cseeman/index.html
><http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cseeman/index.html> 
> 
> 
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:31:46 -0400
>From: "Mann, James H." <JMann at gcpl dot lib dot oh dot us>
>Subject: RE: [IUG] III self-check equipment recommendations
>To: <stomproj at larl dot org>, "IUG INNOPAC List"
>	<innopac at innopacusers dot org>,	<bhudson at lancasterlibraries dot org>
>Message-ID:
>	<7C10821B2302D54FABBD648C6C50DF830195CB62 at mail dot gcpl dot lib dot oh dot us>
>Content-Type: text/plain;charset="US-ASCII"
>
>At GCPL we use:
>3M 15" MicroTouch monitors
>Intermec scanners with stand
>Star TSP 600 thermal receipt printer
>Micro ClientPro 2GHz Celeron with 512 RAM and 20gig hard drive
>Labtec wireless keyboard and mouse combo
>XPPro and Mille only
>** Credit card swipe
>
>Our investment in a self check has been under $1,000 sans CPU. We just
>upgraded from 6-year-old Dell Optiplex GX110 to the Microns which are
>4-year-old circ workstations. We bought the 3M monitors upon the
>recommendation of another library, but have found that 15" Trilogy
touch
>screens are cheaper and have a better warranty. We also had tried a
>batch of Microtech scanners but had some issues with them timing out or
>something so we moved them over to our PCReservation stations where
they
>only had to do a single transaction. The Star TSP seems to be the
>printer of choice, although there has been a fairly well documented
>thread about downloading loading the Star software from the UK website
>to get the autocut feature to work.
>
>I think most sites are running the self checks on junk computers
>(anything that you don't have to go to eBay to buy memory) but as we
>look toward increasing the number of self checks and making them
>actually mission critical I've been thinking about actually buying real
>computers for this application.
>
>Bayscan has been a good resource for us with monitors and receipt
>printers. We buy a lot of "off lease" computers from Access Interactive
>and you might look at their website for deals on small-form-factor
boxes
>from Dell, IBM or HP. There are other off lease resellers out there but
>Access also sells a warranty which has made them appealing. Here's a
>link:
>
>http://shop.1asecure.com/index.cfm?StID=4236
>
>Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> 
>
>Jim Mann
>
>Technology Coordinator
>
>Greene County Public Library
>
>Xenia Ohio 45385
>
>(937)352-4000 x1210
>
>mailto: jmann at gcpl dot lib dot oh dot us
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
>[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Josh Stompro
>Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:17 PM
>To: bhudson at lancasterlibraries dot org; IUG INNOPAC List
>Subject: Re: [IUG] III self-check equipment recommendations
>
>I just want to add that we are having great luck using really old 
>computers for our self check units.  We are currently using 5 Dell 
>Dimension XPS T450's (450Mhz Pentium II, 384MB ram, windows xp, no 
>antivirus(this is key)).  They were purchased in 1999, and just keep 
>running.
>
>We also use Planar 17inch touch screens (PT1701MU-BK), along with 
>standard issue barcode scanners (Metrologic Voyager) and Star TSP643 
>thermal printers.
>Josh
>
>  
>

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac

_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.

_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.