[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:33:14 -0500
- From: "Zhang, Jingping" <zhangj at marshall dot edu>
- Subject: RE: [IUG] Millennium's Interlibrary Loan
Hello Steven and Lauren,
Thank you so much for sharing your experience with us. It is great helpful!!!
Jingping
Jingping Zhang
Assistant Dean of Library Technology / Associate Professor
Marshall University Libraries DL 339
Voice: 304-696-2326 / Cell: 304-634-0110/ Fax: 304-696-5858
zhangj at marshall dot edu <
mailto:zhangj at marshall dot edu>
________________________________
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org on behalf of Steven Moody
Sent: Thu 2/22/2007 5:45 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: [IUG] Millennium's Interlibrary Loan
At 11:47 AM 2/22/2007, you wrote:
Hello,
We currently have Millennium 2005 and use ILLiad as our
interlibrary
loan system. I would like to know who has experience with
Millennium's
Interlibrary Loan system. How you feel about the system functions
and
how you like the financial or bill/overdue management?
Many thanks in advances!!!
We have been using the Innovative's ILL module since 2002 or so.
As with the other respondent, I have never used Illiad.
I've heard Illiad has the capacity to print loan data to a wrapper or
sticker, which the Innovative product doesn't have.
The bill and overdue management is identical with Innovative's handling
of these functions for any other circulated item, since the system
functions by creating a virtual item (distinct from the virtual item in
the ILL module, which causes certain unfortunate disconnects) which is
then checked out to the patron record.
Statistics are also not very well-developed - a delimited file can be
downloaded with more information about each transaction than most would
ever use, but there is no analysis or viewing capacity within the
system.
I suspect I am too close to recognize all the things it DOES which are
not done by other systems -- it does allow interaction with OCLC,
tracking of requests through various stages, requests made by patrons
through the OPAC, requests appear on patron-viewable record,
etc.
For us, it is satisfactory as a basic system but lacking in certain bells
and whistles that would really enhance the experience.
Steve
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
text/plain (text body -- kept)
application/ms-tnef
---