[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Zhou, Don wrote:
Ed,

You are absolutely right. But in most cases you can get around the
junk. We have been able to do that except problems on the serial
checkin boxes page. I think we have to live with that for now until
Innovative can improve the code generating scheme.

I did live with it and hammered out a page that is at least fairly consistent across various browsers. Fortunately from me we hired a Web Designer and *she* has to deal with it now. :-)

The discussion about style sheet: we have been able to just use one
stylesheet to accommodate all browsers [different versions of IE, ff,

You should always be able to use one stylesheet (per media display type anyway), but Innovative's lousy classing makes it awfully hard, though not totally insurmountable.

The fact that iii seems to be going the multiple stylesheet route for their new product is another disaster, in my opinion.

Fact remains that CSS specifies rules only for valid html or xhtml. And innovative makes it impossible to supply that so they don't actually have any basis for complaint if different browsers render things in different ways. They need someone to explain the idea of semantic html to them, very badly. Their html really is a disaster and a shame.

OK, curmudgeon mode off. Thankfully I no longer have to deal with it. :-)

Ed