[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Ed,
You are absolutely right. But in most cases you can get around the
junk. We have been able to do that except problems on the serial
checkin boxes page. I think we have to live with that for now until
Innovative can improve the code generating scheme.
The discussion about style sheet: we have been able to just use one
stylesheet to accommodate all browsers [different versions of IE, ff,
opera, etc] and do away with most image files. We use the stylesheet to
format the links into button like navigation, saving time and gaining
flexibility in different browsers. But do not look for it on our site.
We will probably launch the redesigned one in March during our spring
break.
I have an suggestion: can we get a group together and collect all the
junk codes in different pages and compile those errors? It is too much
for one person, but it probably will not be too big for a community like
ours here. Any takers?
Don Zhou
William Mitchell College of Law
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Ed Seedhouse
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 10:18 AM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: [IUG] I.E. 7 and the Rel 2006 example set
Brown, Alan wrote:
> Which points all IE browsers version 8 and below to ie_styles.css. Its
a
> quick fix and for me not very satisfying. An alternative is to use IE
7
> in standards mode and add a DTD for the fully editable pages e.g.
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
> "
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";>
I have my doubts about putting the Innovative web opac into standards
mode in any browser, though, because there are so many html coding
errors that are coming from Innovative source code that we can't do
anything about. I did it for GVPL's catalogue, following innovative's
recommendations, but I'm not sure it was a good decision given the awful
amount of invalid code.
I was hoping I could go through the files and fix the errors but quickly
found out that this was a task too big for me to tackle in the time
available, even if I had access to all the code.
Ed Seedhouse
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.
_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.
Home
Mailing list