RE: [IUG] enhancements category

["Seeman, Corey" <cseeman at bus dot umich dot edu>]

Sandra -- I might be talking out of turn here, but I think that this was
an internal tagging that the Functional Experts did when something came
over as a "Telnet has, Millennium does not."  These enhancements should
be put in like all others and get tagged that way by the Enhancements
group (Functional Experts).  This is not a separate category, but it
falls to the primary category for the request (Circulation, etc.)

One change we did put in was in the IUG 2007 Program Submissions.  We
are no longer asking if something is for Telnet, Millennium or Both.  

I might be wrong about this, but I thought this was an internally
tracked distinction.

Best -- Corey

Corey Seeman
IUG Chair, 2006-2007


Interim Library Director  &
Associate Director, Information Resources and Systems
Kresge Business Administration Library
Stephen M. Ross School of Business
University of Michigan
701 Tappan Street, K3330
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1234
(734) 764-9969
Cell Phone (734) 717-9734
Fax (734) 764-3839
cseeman at umich dot edu 

http://www.bus.umich.edu/kresgelibrary/
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cseeman/index.html  
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Card, Sandra
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 2:06 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: [IUG] enhancements category

I remember there used to be a category or type that was something like
"Could do this in text but not yet in Millennium".  Does the enhancement
process still include that?  

Sandra Card
Library, CSULA
323-343-4894
scard at calstatela dot edu



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac