RE: [IUG] cursor positioning in webpac

["Zhou, Don" <don dot zhou at wmitchell dot edu>]

Katherine,

Put this in the body element:
document.search.searchText1.focus()---where the searchText1 is the text
box where you want the cursor to be.

Don



-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Kathy Johnson
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 3:47 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: [IUG] cursor positioning in webpac

Hi,

I've had several users ask me if I can fix our webpac so the cursor is
already in the blank search box when they get to the main page.  Can it
be done?  My gut says yes, but I can't figure it out.  Am I missing
something in the WWWoptions?

I already have FORM_FOCUS set to 1, but that's not fixing the problem.

Our catalog's url is http://clas.caltech.edu/


Katherine Johnson
Head of Metadata Resources and Services, Caltech Libraries
California Institute of Technology
Mail Code 1-32
Pasadena, CA  91125
tel: (626) 395-6065 -- fax: (626) 395-6266
kjohnson at library dot caltech dot edu
 

-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:54 PM
To: innopac at innopacusers dot org; alee at menlo dot edu
Subject: Re: [IUG] WAM Filters Again

This was happening when we upgraded to 2005. The problem for us was that
we had uploaded the wam_filter file to our screens directory, when it
should have been uploaded to the http directory. Given that nothing you
do to the wam_filter file is having any effect on actual counts, this
might be your problem as well.

Andrew Welch
Sr. Library Systems Technician
Aurora Public Library
Aurora, CO 80247
303/739-6796

>>> alee at menlo dot edu 9/21/2006 12:38 PM >>>
Hello,
I know this topic has come up before, and I've searched the archives
and the 
IUG Clearinghouse and the III FAQs for guidance, but have not found a
good 
example of a filter that counts just connections, not CSS, not images,
not 
redirects.

I've read the manual, I asked my trainer this Summer, who sent the
question to 
the III help desk, who then referred me to the manual. I'm now stuck.

I've tried adding the X lines to stop the logging, this did not change

anything. I now have a filter with every line commented out, and that
doesn't 
change anything. And, as much as I'd like to believe our database use
went up 
exponentially between June when we were on Silver and July when I
upgraded to 
2006LE, I just can't. We are very small, and Summer is our slowest use
time. 
I've looked at our use for the past few years, and the numbers I'm
getting now 
are simply too high to be realistic for us.

So, at this point I have to wonder, is the new WAM filter process still
set up 
wrong, or has the system underreported WAM statistics for the past 5
years 
that we've been using the proxy server? 

Does anyone have a WAM filter that successfully counts just the number
of 
times patrons connect to the databases that they would be willing to
share?

Many many thanks,
Andrea R. Lee
Information Integration Architect/
Asst. Dean of Library Services
Bowman Library, Menlo College
1000 El Camino Real, Atherton, CA 94027
alee at menlo dot edu 
(650)543-3934





-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ 
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org 
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac

_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.

_______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses.