[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:56:42 -0400 (EDT)
- From: Adam Brin <abrin at brynmawr dot edu>
- Subject: RE: [IUG] cursor positioning in web Pac
try putting:
document.forms['search'].searcharg.focus()
in your body's onload function instead of what you have now.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Stokes Lauren P. wrote:
> Did you restart your web servers?
>
> Lauren Stokes
> Virtual Library Manager
> Las Vegas-Clark County Library District
> stokesl at lvccld dot org
> 702.507.3414
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
> [
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Kathy Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 1:47 PM
> To: IUG INNOPAC List
> Subject: [IUG] cursor positioning in webpac
>
> Hi,
>
> I've had several users ask me if I can fix our webpac so the cursor is
> already in the blank search box when they get to the main page. Can it
> be done? My gut says yes, but I can't figure it out. Am I missing
> something in the WWWoptions?
>
> I already have FORM_FOCUS set to 1, but that's not fixing the problem.
>
> Our catalog's url is
http://clas.caltech.edu/
>
>
> Katherine Johnson
> Head of Metadata Resources and Services, Caltech Libraries
> California Institute of Technology
> Mail Code 1-32
> Pasadena, CA 91125
> tel: (626) 395-6065 -- fax: (626) 395-6266
> kjohnson at library dot caltech dot edu
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
> [
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: innopac at innopacusers dot org; alee at menlo dot edu
> Subject: Re: [IUG] WAM Filters Again
>
> This was happening when we upgraded to 2005. The problem for us was that
> we had uploaded the wam_filter file to our screens directory, when it
> should have been uploaded to the http directory. Given that nothing you
> do to the wam_filter file is having any effect on actual counts, this
> might be your problem as well.
>
> Andrew Welch
> Sr. Library Systems Technician
> Aurora Public Library
> Aurora, CO 80247
> 303/739-6796
>
> >>> alee at menlo dot edu 9/21/2006 12:38 PM >>>
> Hello,
> I know this topic has come up before, and I've searched the archives
> and the
> IUG Clearinghouse and the III FAQs for guidance, but have not found a
> good
> example of a filter that counts just connections, not CSS, not images,
> not
> redirects.
>
> I've read the manual, I asked my trainer this Summer, who sent the
> question to
> the III help desk, who then referred me to the manual. I'm now stuck.
>
> I've tried adding the X lines to stop the logging, this did not change
>
> anything. I now have a filter with every line commented out, and that
> doesn't
> change anything. And, as much as I'd like to believe our database use
> went up
> exponentially between June when we were on Silver and July when I
> upgraded to
> 2006LE, I just can't. We are very small, and Summer is our slowest use
> time.
> I've looked at our use for the past few years, and the numbers I'm
> getting now
> are simply too high to be realistic for us.
>
> So, at this point I have to wonder, is the new WAM filter process still
> set up
> wrong, or has the system underreported WAM statistics for the past 5
> years
> that we've been using the proxy server?
>
> Does anyone have a WAM filter that successfully counts just the number
> of
> times patrons connect to the databases that they would be willing to
> share?
>
> Many many thanks,
> Andrea R. Lee
> Information Integration Architect/
> Asst. Dean of Library Services
> Bowman Library, Menlo College
> 1000 El Camino Real, Atherton, CA 94027
> alee at menlo dot edu
> (650)543-3934
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP:
http://horde.org/imp/
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
>
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
>
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
>
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>