[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Leo,
We haven't seen a difference, but, we have learned the hard way not
to use a high numeric value (ie. 10) for unscoped searches. Unscoped
searches should be done as: http://catalog.cantonpl.org/search~S0 or
http://catalog.cantonpl.org/search~/

[this really becomes an issue if you add another scope later, as
it'll default to the next numeric value (in this case 10)]

With that said, we've stuck to the first method using the ~.


- adam

_____________________________________
Tri-Colleges Systems Coordinator
Bryn Mawr | Haverford | Swarthmore
610.526.5294


-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Leo Papa
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 12:19 PM
To: IUG
Subject: [IUG] Persistent URLs for Scoped Searches


Does anyone know the relative merits/demerits of using the two types of
syntax, below, for persisent URLs?

In essence, the difference in syntax is the use of "search~S10" in example
one, vs "searchscope=10".


http://catalog.cantonpl.org/search~S10/t?SEARCH=DK%20Eyewitness%20top%2010%2
0travel%20guides


http://catalog.cantonpl.org/search/t?SEARCH=DK%20Eyewitness%20top%2010%20tra
vel%20guides&searchscope=10


Leo Papa
Canton Public Library

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac