[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:56:10 -0500
- From: "Craig Johnson" <cjohnson at icpl dot org>
- Subject: RE: Advanced Keyword Search quirks?
Which explains why relevancy/sort works fine for us since we're on 2005.
There's still the AVS "near" (not) problem though. I suppose it's seldom
used, but it's annoying that it doesn't work as advertised. We may need
to change our search instructions - although I'm not sure what could be
said. Without quotes around it, the word still acts as a Boolean limiter
- it's just not clear what that limit is.
Craig Johnson
Iowa City Public Library
www.icpl.org
ccjohnson at icpl dot org
>>> sowder at andrews dot edu 09/13/05 2:22 PM >>>
Innovative has responded with relevancy sort and wildcard searching
being
a known issue. Fix is in release 2005.
Steve
sowder at andrews dot edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
> [
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Steve Sowder
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 1:02 PM
> To: IUG INNOPAC List
> Subject: Re: Advanced Keyword Search quirks?
>
>
> Thanks for the info Craig.
>
> I called the helpdesk and I walked the tech through the search. At the
> NO RECORDS FOUND I heard "huh?".
>
> I have a call tracking number now.
>
>
> Steve
>
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Craig Johnson wrote:
>
> > Steve -
> >
> > Not sure why you're getting the zero "relevance" results - our
catalog
>
> > gives the same numbers regardless of the sort.
> >
> > According to the manual, "near" is supposed to "retrieve records
that
> > contain the specified words or phrases within ten words of each
other
> > in the same indexed field." After looking in our catalog and a
couple
> > others, it's clear this is not even close to being accurate. The
words
>
> > do not need to be in the same indexed field, nor do they need to be
> > within ten words of each other. "Near" searches yield fewer hits
than
> > "and" searches, if not very many fewer, but I can't figure out what
> > the criteria for the different results are.
> >
> > So... there's a bit more information for you, but I'm afraid the
light
>
> > I'm shedding on your questions isn't really what you're looking for.
> >
> > Craig Johnson
> > Iowa City Public Library
> > www.icpl.org
> > ccjohnson at icpl dot org
> >
> > >>> sowder at andrews dot edu 9/13/2005 8:52 AM >>>
> >
> > We just completed (last Friday) the install of AKS and have since
> > discovered some interesting things.
> >
> > When I do an advanced search using "wom?n" as the search term and
> > "date" as the sort term I get 11,197 hits. When I change the sort to
> > "relevance" I
> > get zero hits. Why?
> >
> > When I search for "church near school" I get hits that have the word
> > "church" in a tag 110 field and "school" in a 500 tag. The "near"
to
> > me
> > appears to be a bit "to far" away. Why does it think it is near?
> >
> > Those who have gone through this before please enlighten me.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Steve Sowder Systems Librarian
> > sowder at andrews dot edu Andrews University
> > --
> > This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
> > INNOPAC list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> > Update your subscription options:
> >
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> > --
> > This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
> INNOPAC list
> > Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> > Update your subscription options:
>
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC
> list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your
subscription
> options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC list
> Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> --
> BEGIN-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Teach CanIt if this mail (ID 5087308) is spam:
> Spam:
http://www.andrews.edu/spam/canit/b.php?c=s&i=5087308&m=ab106a6aaa85
> Not spam:
http://www.andrews.edu/spam/canit/b.php?c=n&i=5087308&m=ab106a6aaa85
> Forget vote:
http://www.andrews.edu/spam/canit/b.php?c=f&i=5087308&m=ab106a6aaa85
> ------------------------------------------------------
> END-ANTISPAM-VOTING-LINKS
>
>
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac