[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Elizabeth,
Apologies to the list for beating this dead horse. I do think that there
are many libraries out there who don't know that this behavior is
happening in their catalogs.
Thanks for the tips for workarounds.
Karl
Elizabeth Thomsen wrote:
This is a very complicate and messy issue. For more background, there
was a long discussion on this back in 2003, under the subject ": Losing
Scope from Pages Not on Innovative Server." The problem affects search
boxes on pages not on the server, as well as individual links.
http://innovativeusers.org/list/archives/2003/msg01173.html
We used the Javascript solution that Rich Edwards describes in these
messages, which he could no doubt explain better than I can. Mike
Copley documented a different approach for the Clearinghouse, which you
can see here:
http://innovativeusers.org/cgi-bin/clearinghouse/view.pl?id=108
I think III needs to give us much more information on how scoping works,
and why the scope needs to be set on the server at all.
Elizabeth
Karl Maria Fattig wrote:
Actually Ed, III's own documentation is wrong in this case. I've been
told that they are going to correct this. It certainly gives the
impression that one is able to create a persoistent link to a scoped
searchset, but that is NOT the case.
The part that is particularly misleading is:
"For all searches, you can limit the search to a specific scope by
appending the following to any of the URLs presented above:
&searchscope=<scope number>"
That's just not correct. It may actually display the search and in
many cases it will work, but if the browser user hasn't established an
Innopac sessionid via a cookie set from the Innopac catalog server
prior to clicking on that link, the link will display a scoped browse,
but the results pointed to in the browse index will not be scoped, and
the browse links will point to "incorrect" records.
BTW, we tried messing around with "get" vs "post" and that didn't make
a difference. Perhaps though others have made this work? Is anyone out
there able to demonstrate a scoped-search link into their catalog
originating outside of the catalog?
Thanks,
Karl
Ed Seedhouse wrote:
What III has pointed out to us now is that because our library home
page
is on a different server from our catalog, we cannot include a scope
dropdown from the home page.
That can't be true if you are using the "get" method on the form.
According
to the documentation at
http://csdirect.iii.com/faq/persistenturls.shtml you
can use scopes with persistent url's and all the "get" method does is
tack
stuff on the end of the url.
You will have to create your own hand coded select box since you
can't use
the scope token on other servers, and that means that if you change your
scoping you will have to hand recode that page, but it is surely
do-able.
Ed Seedhouse
Greater Victoria Public Library
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--
Karl Maria Fattig
Technical Services Manager / Catalog Librarian
Interim Acquisitions Librarian
Hawthorne-Longfellow Library
Bowdoin College
3000 College Station
Brunswick, ME 04011-8421
207.725.3027 (vox)
207.725.3083 (fax)
151164662 (icq)
mailto:kfattig at bowdoin dot edu