Re: Preliminary Ballot for 2005 Enhancements Cycle

[Carolyn Piatz <piatz at up dot edu>]

Kristin,

Will the Enhancement process include explanations of the reasons why 
specific enhancements submitted by individual libraries were not selected 
for the ballot?

Carolyn Piatz
University of Portland Library
Portland, Oregon

On Tue, 12 
Apr 2005, Kristen  D. Hewitt wrote:

> Hello -
>
> The Enhancements Co-Coordinators are happy to announce the preliminary
> ballot for the 2005 IUG Enhancement Cycle.
>
> The Functional Experts have been diligently working getting the
> preliminary ballots ready. We had 1192 submissions from 189 different
> IUG member libraries and systems. Getting them into the new categories
> and down to 242 ballot items was not easy so our thanks go out to them.
> As part the Enhancements process, we are going to have a public viewing
> of a preliminary ballot of IUG enhancements prior to the IUG meeting in
> San Francisco. For more information on the ballot numbers, please visit
> the report below.
>
> Mail IUG Enhancements Page:
> http://www.innovativeusers.org/enhancements/index.html
>
>
> IUG Enhancements 2005 Cycle Preliminary Report (IUG password protected)
> http://www.innovativeusers.org/enhancements/2005preliminary/2005Prelimin
> ary_Report.html
>
>
> IUG Enhancements 2005 Cycle Preliminary Ballot (IUG password protected)
> http://www.innovativeusers.org/enhancements/2005preliminary/2005ballot_p
> reliminary.html
>
>
> > From this ballot page, you can download one ballot category into one
> document. We expect to have a little bit of cleanup for the documents,
> as we get closer to the voting date.
>
> The final ballot will be available when voting starts (currently
> scheduled for May 18, 2005). If you have questions, you may direct them
> to:
>
> Kristen Hewitt (hewittk at westervillelibrary dot org)
>
> Mieko Yamaguchi (iss053 at bangor dot ac dot uk)
>
> Corey Seeman (CSeeman at utnet dot utoledo dot edu)
>
>
>
> We will notify the list when the balloting starts.
>
> **Please feel free to share this with others at your library. You may
> not provide this to people not currently at an IUG member library.
> Additionally, please follow the guidelines of the List Netiquette on
> enhancements: "You may discuss enhancements in general terms of things
> you would like to see the system do. However, do not post specific
> enhancements from the IUG ballot or Innovative's Preliminary Release
> Enhancements on the list. Treat this as confidential information for
> customers of Innovative only. If you have a question about a specific
> enhancement on the ballot, contact the Enhancements Coordinators or the
> Functional Expert of the module in question. Contact Innovative for
> questions about items on the Preliminary Release lists."**
>
> As always, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact us via
> email.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Kristen Hewitt, Westerville Public Library
> Mieko Yamaguchi, University of Wales Bangor
> Corey Seeman, University of Toledo
> IUG Enhancement Co-Coordinators
> IUG Steering Committee Members at Large
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>  text/plain (text body -- kept)
>  text/html
> ---
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac