Re: Preliminary Ballot for 2005 Enhancements Cycle
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
- From: Carolyn Piatz <piatz at up dot edu>
- Subject: Re: Preliminary Ballot for 2005 Enhancements Cycle
Will the Enhancement process include explanations of the reasons why
specific enhancements submitted by individual libraries were not selected
for the ballot?
University of Portland Library
On Tue, 12
Apr 2005, Kristen D. Hewitt wrote:
The Enhancements Co-Coordinators are happy to announce the preliminary
ballot for the 2005 IUG Enhancement Cycle.
The Functional Experts have been diligently working getting the
preliminary ballots ready. We had 1192 submissions from 189 different
IUG member libraries and systems. Getting them into the new categories
and down to 242 ballot items was not easy so our thanks go out to them.
As part the Enhancements process, we are going to have a public viewing
of a preliminary ballot of IUG enhancements prior to the IUG meeting in
San Francisco. For more information on the ballot numbers, please visit
the report below.
Mail IUG Enhancements Page:
IUG Enhancements 2005 Cycle Preliminary Report (IUG password protected)
IUG Enhancements 2005 Cycle Preliminary Ballot (IUG password protected)
From this ballot page, you can download one ballot category into one
document. We expect to have a little bit of cleanup for the documents,
as we get closer to the voting date.
The final ballot will be available when voting starts (currently
scheduled for May 18, 2005). If you have questions, you may direct them
Kristen Hewitt (hewittk at westervillelibrary dot org)
Mieko Yamaguchi (iss053 at bangor dot ac dot uk)
Corey Seeman (CSeeman at utnet dot utoledo dot edu)
We will notify the list when the balloting starts.
**Please feel free to share this with others at your library. You may
not provide this to people not currently at an IUG member library.
Additionally, please follow the guidelines of the List Netiquette on
enhancements: "You may discuss enhancements in general terms of things
you would like to see the system do. However, do not post specific
enhancements from the IUG ballot or Innovative's Preliminary Release
Enhancements on the list. Treat this as confidential information for
customers of Innovative only. If you have a question about a specific
enhancement on the ballot, contact the Enhancements Coordinators or the
Functional Expert of the module in question. Contact Innovative for
questions about items on the Preliminary Release lists."**
As always, if you have any questions, please feel free to contact us via
Kristen Hewitt, Westerville Public Library
Mieko Yamaguchi, University of Wales Bangor
Corey Seeman, University of Toledo
IUG Enhancement Co-Coordinators
IUG Steering Committee Members at Large
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/plain (text body -- kept)
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac