RE: Reviewing the Order Record Coding

["Hoyte, Daniel" <hoyte at chapman dot edu>]

At Chapman, we are using the codes as follows:

Code1: Leatherby, person keying the order? (Roger?)
Code2: Law, person keying the order
Code3: leatherby, selectors? 
Code4: suppression/unused

Daniel Hoyte
Acquisitions Technician
Systems Coordinator
Chapman University Law Library
hoyte at chapman dot edu
(714) 628-2508


-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Emerita Cuesta
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 10:31 AM
To: innopac at innopacusers dot org
Subject: Reviewing the Order Record Coding

We are reviewing our order record coding in order to eliminate some
problems that have crept in over the years. I'm interested in knowing
how other libraries are using CODE1, CODE2, CODE3, and CODE4. Currently
we do not use two of those and the other two are used for
housekeeping-type things. I'm looking for recommendations.

 

Thanks for the input!

 

Emerita M. Cuesta

Asst. Director for Technical Services and 

Acquisitions Librarian

University of Miami Law Library

ecuesta at law dot miami dot edu

305-284-6330

 



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac