[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
Nope. They said that was the way of it...the first t-field prints on the circ receipt. That's why we made the 240 u change.
DAVID E. RUML
Bibliographic Database and Systems Admin.
Carrollton Public Library at Hebron & Josey
4220 N. Josey Lane
CARROLLTON, TEXAS 75010
david dot ruml at cityofcarrollton dot com
http://www.cityofcarrollton.com/library
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org]On Behalf Of Mary F Tilley
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 3:10 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: RE: 240 and 245 fields in MARC record SEE Subject: Title
fieldson duedate slips
This approach might be good from a circulation point of view, but it could
really raise havoc with the opac display.
This approach might work well for a public library or smaller library, but,
if you have a large music, law or classics collection in your library, you
probably depend on the use of the 240 uniform title to search in your
database. Please talk about this with your technical services and
reference librarians before you change this. Maybe there are some other
ways to force the 245 to always print on circulation receipts rather than
the first field coded t.
Mary Tilley
Authority Specialist
Technical Services
University of Nebraska--Lincoln Libraries
"Ericsson, Paul"
<PEricsson at onconc
ord.com> To
Sent by: "IUG INNOPAC List"
innopac-bounces at i <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
nnopacusers.org cc
Subject
02/23/2005 02:49 RE: 240 and 245 fields in MARC
PM record SEE Subject: Title fields on
duedate slips
Please respond to
IUG INNOPAC List
<innopac at innopacu
sers.org>
Stephanie, Peggy & colleagues --
We had this same problem - it appears to be a typical III record mapping
from the MARC record into the III field group tags.
If you search the archive for a posting by me last autumn with the
Subject: "Title fields on duedate slips" you will find some excellent
replies by others on the list, with specific information about indexing,
OPAC displays, and other "ripples in the pond".
We had a bit of a skirmish with getting this call assigned to the
correct team, but Monica Ertel at III was wonderful in assisting us, and
once our call got in the right place, the work was started, and
badda-bing, all done!
The problem of 240 fields appearing on duedate slips affects a small
percentage of our materials, but what a major headache and PR problem
with patrons.
Paul
___________________________________________
Paul Ericsson
Adult Services Supervisor / Automation Coordinator
Concord Public Library
http://www.onconcord.com
45 Green St. Concord, NH 03301 603 230-3697
pericsson at onconcord dot com
___________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of S. D'Angelico
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 3:24 PM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: 240 and 245 fields in MARC record
This sounds like something our library would like to do. Are there
any issues that have come up because of this change? Also, does this
affect the OPAC display? (When our patrons search by author or title,
they often don't realize that the uniform title is showing in the browse
display - and don't go any further.) Did you change the field group tag
yourself, using Global Update, or did III have to do it?
Thanks for any input.
Stephanie
David Ruml wrote:
>The circ receipt gets title info from the first t-coded tag in the bib
record. We had our 240 tags changed to field group u, so that the 245
would show up as the first t field.
>
>DAVID E. RUML
>Bibliographic Database and Systems Admin.
>Carrollton Public Library at Hebron & Josey 4220 N. Josey Lane
>CARROLLTON, TEXAS 75010
>
>david dot ruml at cityofcarrollton dot com
>
http://www.cityofcarrollton.com/library
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
>[
mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org]On Behalf Of Peggy Sisselman
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:26 PM
>To: IUG INNOPAC List
>Subject: Re: 240 and 245 fields in MARC record
>
>
>Dear List,
>
>Here is a problem we have. A book was first published in New Zealand
>under the title "Golden deeds". This title appears in the 240 field.
>
>We have the US published book, title is "Strength of the sun." When
>you go to the shelf this is the title you see. This title is in the
245 field.
>
>A patron brings home her receipt from the library and returns here to
>say she does not have "Golden deeds" but that is what appears on her
>slip. If someone were to place a hold on this book, we'd be looking
>for golden deeds and never find the book. We tried to search the
>database by golden deeds and couldn't even find the book.
>
>Please can someone tell me how we can do something about this. Because
>if the object of a library is to help people find things, this is
>definitely not working....
>
>Thank you for your help.
>
>Peggy
>
>Peggy Sisselman
>Acquisitions/Technical Services
>Poughkeepsie Public Library District
>psisselman at poklib dot org
>845.485.3445 x 3337
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
>list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
>options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
>list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
>options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
>
>
>
--
______________________________________________________________
Stephanie D'Angelico, Reference & System Admin. Librarian Pennsauken
Free Public Library
5605 Crescent Blvd.
Pennsauken, NJ 08110
Phone: 856-665-5959 x.18
Fax: 856-486-0142
Email: dangelic at camnet dot org
_____________________________________________________________
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org Update your subscription
options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
Home
Mailing list