[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
We do a lot of that sort of load, and we modify the records to taste.
Main features are using global update to change the labels, adding a
bolded link to the resource, and we make the location linkable to
explain our collection. Also, we add a 500 field to any online book or
journal so that you can type in a keyword term plus the words "full text
access" to bring up online resources relating to that topic. Eventually
we'd like to add a scope for online resources, but for now users in the
know can navigate this just fine. The only thing I haven't been able to
do is to change the status to "online" from "check shelves." If anyone
knows a way to do that without adding thousands of items, please send me
the recipe.

You can see an example at:

http://qcat.quinnipiac.edu/search/t?SEARCH=Air+%26+space+power+journal

Terry

Terry Ballard, Automation Librarian
The Arnold Bernhard Library, Quinnipiac University
275 Mt. Carmel Ave.
Hamden, CT, 06518
terry dot ballard at quinnipiac dot edu
http://faculty.quinnipiac.edu/libraries/tballard

"Never put off until tomorrow that which could just as easily be done
the day after tomorrow."

Mark Twain


-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org
[mailto:innopac-bounces at innopacusers dot org] On Behalf Of Frances, Melodie
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:59 PM
To: autocat at listserv dot buffalo dot edu; innopac at innopacusers dot org
Subject: FULL BIB RECORDS FOR AGGREGATE DATABASES



Sorry for cross posting, but I would like to know who all out there are
downloading/cataloging full bib records for their individual aggregate
database titles? We use the coverage loads that vendors are supplying
and use III as our local system, but we end up with fairly 'naked'
looking bib records for the individual titles - as a catalogor I am not
reall thrilled with these records.

So, are people downloading full records, if so who is doing the actual
work, how did you justify it (if you had to) - did any pros or cons come
about in the process - and for people who chose not to, what was your
reason for that?

BTW, we're are fairly small - only have 9-11 aggregate databases anyway,
but then are also understaffed in the catalog department.

Thanks for any and all input.

Melodie Frances
Graduate Theological Union

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac