[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Has anyone else run into this?

In character based system we controlled the order of the tags in the bib
record. ie. We placed the 099 tag before the 050 tag so that III would
present the 099 call number to the user instead of the 050. (It also
seems like there was an option somewhere that specified the order of
preference between 050 090 and 099. Can't find it now that we are on
Silver.)

Per III Help Desk, Millennium always saves the tags in numeric order
(except 6xx). So, for any record saved with Millennium we now give the
users the (unwanted) 050 call number. If you call up an old bib
records and change _anything_ in the bib record with Millennium and save
this sequence change happens. This is a problem for us because the 050 tag
contains the call number for serials and the 099 contains "Shelved by
Title". We are not ready to change serials stacks to call number
sequence yet.

III wants us to change the field group tag from "c" to "y" for the 050s
so that they won't index and it will default to the 099. With several
thousand of them, Bib Services is not exactly thrilled about this.
Esp, since they will have to change them back when we do resequence the
serials stacks.

The only solution they see is to not use Millennium but stay with
character based.

[Reordering of some other tags are also causing us problems.]

Do you have any ideas for us?


Thanks in advance


Steve Sowder Systems Librarian
sowder@xxxxxxxxxx Andrews University