[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:58:41 -0400
- From: "William Gray" <wgray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: minimum PC hardware?
I seem to recall that a 2.4 GHz processor with 512 MB RAM (if not
better) was deemed necessary for Release 2003, as recommended by other
IUGers. The minimum specs given by III weren't all that realistic,
especially if you like to run other programs simultaneously on the same
computer (like, say, a Web browser). We are currently using 400MHz
processors with 128MB RAM, and at times Millennium can be painfully
slow, or will freeze up altogether (we recorded 80 instances in a
1-month period, and I don't believe every incidence got recorded, so
there were likely more); we're due for computer upgrades after the turn
of the fiscal year in July, so feel free to ask me again then how well
Millennium works with the improced computer speed.
--William Gray
Library Technical Assistant, Lending Services
Greenwich Library
-----Original Message-----
From: taysomd@xxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:taysomd@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:12 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: taysomd@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: minimum PC hardware?
We have finally gotten the (tentative) go ahead to move from character
to Millennium this next fiscal year. I know this will require upgrading
/replacing PCs. However, looking at the minimum configuration listed on
Csdirect I recall a fair amount of discussion on the list in the past to
the effect that that configuration is woefully inadequate. I tried
searching the archives with no results, I guess it's too early monday
morning for my brain to be functioning. :-(
Could someone chime in with what the group generally considers to be a
recommended configuration for PCs (for staff machines) as opposed to a
minimum configuration?
thanks,
---------------------------------------
Dan Taysom
Computer Services Librarian
U.C. Hastings Law Library
taysomd@xxxxxxxxxx
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx Update your subscription
options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac