Re: Alternative wording for LIB USE ONLY

[Alison Masterpasqua <amaster1@xxxxxxxxxx>]

How about "In-House Use"?

At 02:48 PM 6/2/2004 -0700, you wrote:
> Hello!
>
> We are hoping to come up with alternative wording for the item status "LIB 
> USE ONLY" in order to be more "user friendly" in WebOPAC displays. The 
> best we could come up with is "NON CIRCULATING" which some of our staff 
> feels is equally as obtuse.
>
> Realizing that the limit for item status descriptions is 15 characters 
> (including spaces) what are some other libraries using as an item status 
> description for their item status for reference and other non-circulating 
> books? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt Ciszek
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Matthew P. Ciszek
> Systems Librarian
> Golden Gate University
> Law and University Libraries
> 536 Mission Street
> San Francisco, CA 94105
> Office: (415) 442-6686
> Fax: (415) 512-9395
> Email: mciszek@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options: 
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac

Alison Masterpasqua
Access & Lending Services Supervisor
x8478