RE: Review File Question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 09:56:09 -0400
- From: "Heard, Jeffrey" <Jeffrey.Heard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Review File Question
I tried 260 |c >= 2000 and the same with the 008. I received things which had like 1974 in the 260 $c.
[mailto:innopac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Elizabeth Thomsen
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 9:50 AM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: Review File Question
Could you be more specific about how you're searching, and what wrong
records you're getting? In general, it's much easier to work with the
date in 008 because it's a single, simple four digit number. For this
search, Date One > 1999 should work.
The problem with the date in 260|c is that it's in a string of text that
may or may not have other data, like a c or p preceding the date. But
in this particular case, how about doing 260|c MATCHES 200[0-4] ? That
would find every record with 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 or 2004 in 260|c.
Heard, Jeffrey wrote:
> We are trying to create a list of everything published after 1999. We cannot seem to get it to work correctly. We tried to use
> 260 $c and the date in the 008, but still receive records which should not be included. Any help would be appreciated.
> Jeff Heard
> Sinclair Community College
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
Elizabeth Thomsen, Member Services Manager
NOBLE: North of Boston Library Exchange
Danvers MA 01923
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac