RE: negative encumberances

["David Ruml" <David.Ruml@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, we use the x-record procedure to pay invoices for which there are no order records.  Certainly better than the old "you need an order record to pay an invoice".  Cuts down on the number of order records we create.

DAVID E. RUML
Cataloging & Systems
Carrollton Public Library
4220 N. Josey Lane
CARROLLTON, TEXAS  75010

972-466-4712
david.ruml@xxxxxxxxxx
www.cityofcarrollton.com/library


-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:innopac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barbara Boehnke
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 7:54 AM
To: IUG INNOPAC List
Subject: Re: negative encumberances


Thanks, it works.  Have you ever heard of an x-record?

Mieko Yamaguchi wrote:
> Have you looked at the CSDirect FAQ page on negative encumbrances?
> 
> http://csdirect.iii.com/faq/negenc.shtml
> 
> Mieko
> 
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, ROSE MARIE MARTIN wrote:
> 
> 
>>Has anyone who uses the Acquisitions module had the experience of having
>>negative encumbrances appear for a particular fund? i.e.$ -595.00 as an
>>encumbrance for a particular fund. I have looked at order records for
>>this fund and cannot determine a cause so that I can correct it. If you
>>have had this experience and can you offer an explanation for the cause
>>I would appreciate hearing from you.
> 
> 
> -----
> Mieko Yamaguchi                                m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx
> Technical Services Manager/System Coordinator        +44 (0)1248 382970
> Main Library, University of Wales Bangor, UK   +44 (0)1248 382979 (Fax)
> 
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac


--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac