Re: 655 2nd indicator

["Nae Hyun Kim" <nkim@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Aha! Indeed, it hasn't been updated. Well, I knew the difference between the two taggings (I guess I lied); I just didn't know why our system would take one and not the other. Thanks for your help.

Naehyun Kim
Catalog Librarian
Manhattan School of Music
-------------------------

This is a recent change to the MARC coding rules: all the values allowable in the 2nd indicator position of 650 are now permitted for 655s as well, previously the source of the heading was specified in subfield $2 of 655. Technically speaking, both options are correct. The tag tables/indexing in your database have not been updated to allow for this new change, which is why it doesn't index the 655_0 headings.

Hope that helps.

Paul Burry
Library Technical Assistant (Cataloguing)
University of Northern British Columbia
library.unbc.ca
250.960.6499

-----Original Message-----
From: 	innopac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:innopac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Nae Hyun Kim
Sent:	Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:26 AM
To:	innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	655 2nd indicator

I'm not sure what the difference is between the following:

655  0 American poetry
655  7 American poetry $2 lcsh

For some reason, if I use the 2nd option, it falls into our subject 
index, but not if I use the 1st, in which case, it is not even 
searchable. Anyone has any idea?

Thank you,
Naehyun Kim
Manhattan School of Music



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
 text/plain (text body -- kept)
 text/html
---