Re: printer porblem

[Ted Waller <wallert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, label printing is
tricky.  We use a lovely product called MacroExpress to create macros
to produce labels from a batch queue.  This procedure allows you to use
any label stock or printer you desire because the macros are tailored
to the stock.  The use of macros reduces the number of steps from 22 to
4.  The steps are:

1. Queue monographic labels to print

2. The first macro
 creates a



 sends the

call/volume

from a


call/volume

 for printing

 


innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:



Send INNOPAC mailing list submissions to
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx


http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac

innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx


innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx















lmueller@xxxxxxxxxx)










<MMcClellan@xxxxxxxxxx>
"'innopac@xxxxxxxxxx'" <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>


innopac@xxxxxxxxxx




















<Laurie.Willis@xxxxxxxxxx>
<innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx














mailto:gyger@xxxxxxxxxx] 


innopac@xxxxxxxxxx



































gyger@xxxxxxxxxx





We have been looking at the feature that automatically clears in transit









INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac






INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac









<eeva.stierwalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
<innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx














eeva.stierwalt@xxxxxxxxxx





MMcClellan@xxxxxxxxxx 12/09/03 02:28PM >>>




A follow up question, can this be agency specific or is it a system =
















INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/inn=













<gyger@xxxxxxxxxx>
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx

























gyger@xxxxxxxxxx





Hello!  We here at London Public Library have been using this clearing program for over a year now and it works extremely well for us! We have 16 branches and our in-transit clearing is done once the item has been in-transit for 24 hours.  We are currently looking into changing this to a longer period given that items don't always make it back to the shelves in 24 hours.  The items placed on hold during the "in-transit" process actually get picked up by the paging list and that works well for us.  One thing that we've had a problem with, however, is that things that go into transit automatically from the Clear the Holdshelf Program do not get picked up in the Automated Clearing of In-transit Status Program (III has just informed me that this is in Release 2003).  This means that we've had to checkin items placed into in-transit by the Clear the Holdshelf program before they go into the shipment and re-place them in-transit!  Every week, I create a list of it



 been in transit more than 24 hours and I remove the "t" Status and the "m" Message field in Rapid Update.  I clear the Error Report daily.  It reports all items that have had their status cleared.  It is useful in that if there are no items there, one knows that the automated program isn't working!  Otherwise, because of the large number of in-transits we have daily, I don't spend any time looking at the log details!


Given the size of our operation--we have thousands of in-transits a day--the program in general saves us a tremendous amount of time and we love it!  I hope this helps!  Kind regards, Eeva









eeva.stierwalt@xxxxxxxxxx





gyger@xxxxxxxxxx 12/09/03 01:26PM >>>




Cindy,
































gyger@xxxxxxxxxx





We have been looking at the feature that automatically clears in transit









INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac



--

INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac









INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac










<iss053@xxxxxxxxxx>
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx







http://innovativeusers.org/enhancements/newcycle/request.html







What we would like is to have the system know about suppression codes,






m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx









innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
<boggs@xxxxxxxxxx>

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx





There is a bib record for a periodical title.  The bib record has two 






























boggs@xxxxxxxxxx












<JHARDEN@xxxxxxxxxx>
<innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>, <imug-l@xxxxxxxxxx>

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx




































































jharden@xxxxxxxxxx








<katoj@xxxxxxxxxx>
<innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx















katoj@xxxxxxxxxx















lmueller@xxxxxxxxxx

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx










<katoj@xxxxxxxxxx>





We are having some problems with printing labels on the Epson LQ-














katoj@xxxxxxxxxx













INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx

http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac








innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
<R.Fallon@xxxxxxxxxx>

b.wilson@xxxxxxxxxx, j.langenstrass@xxxxxxxxxx
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx































III&#8217;s handling of subject subdivision authority records seems to my 



























































































jharden@xxxxxxxxxx













r.fallon@xxxxxxxxxx







<tahirs2001@xxxxxxxxxx>
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx


innopac@xxxxxxxxxx






















<et@xxxxxxxxxx>
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx

innopac@xxxxxxxxxx





Do you keep the suppressed items (ones to be withdrawn/deleted) forever on






















-- 










--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
text/html (html body -- converted)
---