[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Jamen,

I would suggest that you use a note field in the order record. You can put anything in this field and it doesn't display on the OPAC. 

In this type of situation, we setup the order record as a book/monographic order since it is a one time/firm order, put a note in indicating volume purchased.

Laura 

Laura E. Kinner
Head, Technical Services & Systems
Melvin J. Zahnow Library
Saginaw Valley State University
University Center, MI 48710
(989) 964-7092
lek@xxxxxxxxxx

>>> JMcGranahan@xxxxxxxxxx 09/29/03 11:22AM >>>
Using Millennium 2002 Phase 3:

Good morning once again,

First, thank you to all of you who quickly responded to my earlier question
about the status display in our OPAC.  I knew it had to be an easy answer.
Here's another question for you, though.  There have been a couple of
instances where we have wanted to order individual volumes of a multi-volume
set, but not the complete set.  I'd like to use one bib record for this, but
how can I identify the different volumes I'm looking for in the order
record?  It's not really an issue of copies because they're different
volumes.  And we don't want the complete set, so the Volumes field won't
work either.  Ideas?

Jamen McGranahan
Systems Services Librarian
Waggoner Library/Trevecca Nazarene University
333 Murfreesboro Road
Nashville, TN  37210
615.248.7732
fax - 615.248.1471



--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx 
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac