RE: check-in record message box

["Hoyte, Daniel" <hoyte@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At Chapman Law Library, we sue the message box.  The primary use that we put it to is for titles that do not process the same as other titles in that class.  An example of that might be a volume that gets sent to archives instead of discarded.
 
Daniel Hoyte
Serials/ Acquisitions Technician
Systems Coordenator
Chapman University Law Library
714-628-2508
hoyte@xxxxxxxxxx
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Barb Black [mailto:BBLACK@xxxxxxxxxx] 
	Sent: Fri 8/15/2003 12:23 PM 
	To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx 
	Cc: 
	Subject: check-in record message box
	
	

	We are considering asking III to turn on the Checkin Record Message Box, an enhancement in Rel. 2002, Ph 2, I think.  We were thinking of putting processing information in the message box.  I'd be interested in hearing from anyone (offlist) who is currently using the message box, how you're using it and any observations you might have on how it's working for you.
	Barb Black
	Iowa CIty Public Library
	
	
	
	--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
	multipart/alternative
	  text/plain (text body -- kept)
	  text/html
	---
	--
	This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
	Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
	Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
	

­®*LŠg‘zš+¶šèqë,yÓ0JZ®Û&º[b¥ªíþh±yÛ^Æß镨§µìmn‡r‘êmjše‰Æ­Š‰ÿšËgy