RE: order fields in 949 (in CatME) not showing up in III orderrecord.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:59:56 -0400
- From: "Judith A Schneider" <SchneiderJ@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: order fields in 949 (in CatME) not showing up in III orderrecord.
To input variable length fields in an order record that is created by
downloading the information from OCLC, you need to use subfields in the
949 field. See page 102793 in the manual for an explanation.
HTH,
Judy Schneider
US GAO Library
schneiderj@xxxxxxxxxx
(202) 512-4304
My opinions are mine! All Mine!
So many books .... So little time
>>> STROUSE@xxxxxxxxxx 08/06/03 05:04PM >>>
The way we insert variable fields in the order record is with one or
more additional 949 fields with second indicator of 1 and subfields
instead of command strings.
The command line codes for the first 949 do not appear in our load
table, only in the manual. The variable fields appear in the load
table.
The one-letter codes represent subfields. The subfield codes are not
necessarily the same as the III field group tags.
82 > ORDER INT. NOTE(z) 949 b
83 > ORDER VEN. NOTE(v) 949 c
84 > ORDER VEN. ADDR.(q) 949 d
85 > ORDER SELECTOR(s) 949 e
86 > ORDER VEN TITLE #(f) 949 f
87 > ORDER IDENTITY(i) 949 g
So for us, a order-creation 949 look something like this:
949 *recs=bo;vd=abse;loc=media;fd=media;c1=r;fm=v;ep=0.00;
949 1 |b pc |c dvd |e Roazen
(in OCLC, the spaces before and after the subfield codes (|x) are
important).
If that doesn't work, try
949 *recs=bo;vd=abse;loc=media;fd=media;c1=r;fm=v;ep=0.00;
949 1 |b pc
949 1 |c dvd
949 1 |e Roazen
It seems to work for us.
Hope that makes sense,
Mary
Mary M. Strouse
Head of Technical Services
Judge Kathryn J. DuFour Law Library
The Catholic University of America
Washington, DC
(202) 319-5547 strouse@xxxxxxxxxx
http://law.cua.edu/library/
-----Original Message-----
From: Ruth Roazen [mailto:Ruth.Roazen@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:07 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: order fields in 949 (in CatME) not showing up in III order
record.
We are having a problem with certain fields, variable and fixed
length,
in
the 949 in CatME, not showing up in the resulting order record in III.
Heres an example 949
949
*recs=bo;vd=abse;loc=media;fd=media;c1=r;fm=v;ep=0.00;z=pc;v=dvd;s=roaze
n;
When the record is exported into III none of these fields is present.
internal note z=pc
vendor note v=dvd
requestor s=roazen
location loc=media
all of these are in the III manual as valid and they are all in our
bib
and
order load table
any ideas about what's not right would be welcome (and a call is in the
hands of III already)
Ruth Roazen, Unique Materials and Special Formats Librarian
Cline Library, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona
mailto:Ruth.Roazen@xxxxxxxxxx
(w) (928) 523-1365 (fax) (928) 523-8043
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac