[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:46:51 -0400
- From: John Dillon <JDillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Create List of records that have no Bib level Lib Has field
Jeff,
The trick you may be looking for is to say that the H tag field = nothing.
(Just hit <enter> for nothing. If I remember right, this brings up Bibs
that don't have any occurence of that field. You could search both Bibs and
Checkins at once by first specifying the Bib h tag = nothing, And... then
use the ? sign to switch to Checkin field options to AND the same
specification. It would look like this, the second Lib Has representing
from the Checkin:
Find BIBLIOGRAPHIC records that satisfy the following conditions
BIB LVL = s AND LIB. HAS = AND LIB. HAS =
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Malch [mailto:malchj@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:33 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: roushb@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Create List of records that have no Bib level Lib Has field
Hello---
I'm looking for a boolean search solution in the create list function
that will get me the following records:
All serial bib records (bib level s) that do not have a holdings
statement, either in the bib record or the checkin record.
(history/background) We designate holdings with an 'h' rather than a
marc tag at this time.
Currently I have been entering this beginning part of the string for
the search:
BIB LEVEL = s AND LIB. HAS
but the problem is that there is no boolean operator for "give me the
records if the Lib. Has field doesn't exist." (e.g. BIB LEVEL = s AND
LIB. HAS not exist AND ........)
I do know that when I'm in the checkin level (? -> C) I can get "/3
CHECKIN" which will allow me to retrieve a boolean on whether the
checkin record "e)xists" or "n)ot exists". Is there something like
this for the Lib. Has field in either the bib or checkin levels? If
not can III turn it on?
I do know that we can print out every serial record's lib. has field
and see if any record is missing a holdings statement, but I was
hoping to trim down the list from our entire serials collection to
just the records with missing information.
Thanks.
-----------------------------------------
Jeff Malch
Library Computer Services Assistant
U.C. Hastings College of the Law Library
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102-4978
(415)565-4767
malchj@xxxxxxxxxx
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac