Re: Duplicate Enhancements?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:07:27 +0100 (BST)
- From: Mieko Yamaguchi <iss053@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Duplicate Enhancements?
Although I am (with Corey Seeman) the incoming IUG Co-Enhancement
Coordinator, I cannot offer you an "official" answer to your question
(since there isn't one!).
Votes for enhancements in each category are counted separately. If the
enhancement is very important to you I suggest you vote for it in both
categories. Although we try and eliminate duplicate enhancement
suggestions as much as possible, in many libraries different categories
are considered by different groups of library staff. It is therefore
important for some enhancements to appear in more than one categories
so they are seen by all the relevant people.
For the next cycle of enhancements we are proposing some changes, for
example, fewer circulation categories with more functions within each
category so there might be fewer duplications. Watch this space!
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Mary Ellen Kenreich wrote:
> We're working on our Enhancements ballot and we've noticed there are
> some enhancements that are duplicated across the categories. Should we
> only vote for one, depending on which category can spare a vote, or
> should we vote for both to indicate that it is very important to us?
> This is our first year with III and the enhancements process. Any
> suggested strategies would be welcomed!
Mieko Yamaguchi m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx
Technical Services Manager/System Coordinator +44 (0)1248 382970
Main Library, University of Wales Bangor, UK +44 (0)1248 382979 (Fax)