[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:53:09 -0700
- From: Karen Johnson <johnsonka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Release 2, phase 2 and slowness
Laurie,
We had terrible problems as well, but tests did show that it was the speed
of our local network in the library. I got faster response from Millennium
remotely via DSL than in the library. Other locations on campus also got
more speed. We were able to move to 100 base T and that did solve the
problem for us.
Karen
At 08:34 AM 4/16/2003 -0700, Laurie Willis wrote:
>Innovative convinced us that the slowness was caused by our server, after
>sending the problem to "programming", who weren't able to fix it. I've
>gone ahead and placed an order for a new & upgraded server. I guess I
>should have checked with the list first to see how many others were
>experiencing the same problem! But we were about due for a server upgrade
>anyway. The server won't be installed until June. In the meantime, we've
>severely limited the number of Create Lists and statistical reports that
>are running during hours when we're open, and this has helped the speed at
>the Circulation Desk considerably.
>
>One thing you might try that was suggested by the Help Desk is to make
>sure your network speed is 100 Base T and not 10 Base T. Our network can
>handle the 100 Base T, but our current server can't, which is one reason
>we're going ahead with the upgrade.
>
>Good luck to all of you who are being slowed down!
>
>Laurie Willis
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carter, Michelle [mailto:LRC135@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 4:01 PM
>To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Release 2, phase 2 and slowness
>
>Listserve,
>
>I've contacted Innovative's help desk - helpful but no answer.
>
>After we installed Release 2, phase 2, we noticed that the majority of our
>circ PCs are slower - primarily when they are in the check in and check
>out function. Once the patron's barcode has been scanned, it takes the
>system 3-5 seconds to "recognize" the information. Prior to the upgrade,
>it seemed to happen instantaneously.
>
>I have contacted our IS Department. Interestingly enough, we have one
>MilCirc pc, in the basement, which does fine. The PCs that are on the 1st
>floor are the ones that are having the slowness problems.
>
>Your comments are appreciated.
>
>Michelle
>
>
>
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
>Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
>Update your subscription options:
>http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
>
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
>Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
>Update your subscription options:
>http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
***************************************************************
Karen Johnson
Director of Library Systems
University of San Francisco
2130 Fulton St.
San Francisco, CA 94117
(415)422-2759 Phone
(415)422-2233 FAX
johnsonka@xxxxxxxxxx