[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 14:27:36 -0400
- From: "V. Rani Sinha" <sinhav@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: fund encoding on order records
As a new Millenium user, I am interested in exploiting the full capacity of
the order record.
To date, my institution has tried to encode order records to keep track of
endowed funds and departmental funds. The problem is that we have used the
same subfield of the order record to track both the allocation of endowed
funds *and* the allocation of departmental funds. This has made it
essentially impossible for the Innovative system to produce automated fund
reports. System-generated reports have to be massaged manually to present
an accurate record of our encumbrance.
What we would like to do is remove endowed funds from the subfields of the
order record, because we do not need to track them through III. We have
other software which track the allocation of endowed funds, so it is not
necessary to track endowed fund allocation through the order record subfields.
We know that we have not used the full extent of codes available on the
order record, and we want to make an improvement in that regard.
We would like to know more about your experiences with the encoding of
order records to track funds, and how you have handled the
encoding/tracking of external funds.
We were also advised by an III trainer to inquire on this listserv about
the use of status g on order records, as well as the method of using a lump
encumbrance.
Our over-riding objective is to let the system do the work for us in the
generation of fund reports. Thanks.
Rani
Vaswati R. Sinha ph : (610) 330-5636
Serials & Acquisitions Librarian e-mail :
sinhav@xxxxxxxxxx
Skillman Library
Lafayette College
710 Sullivan Road
Easton, PA 18042-1797