Re: off-campus collections

[Marilyn Kamp <marilyn.kamp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At SSU, we have an Automated Storage and Retrieval System as part of our new
library - it is far superior tp off-site storage and considerably cheaper to
build that another entire building. The vendor is HK Systems located in Salt
Lake City.  Take a look at our webpage - I really think it's the only way to
go.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carty, Michael" <mcarty@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Innopac Users Group (E-mail)" <INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Ed Evans (E-mail)" <eevans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: off-campus collections


> Some general background info:
>
> LMU has 1 library building on campus.  We are rapidly running out of
> physical space for our collection and one of our options is to move part
of
> our collection to a large building off campus (some staff might move with
it
> as well).
>
> So my fuzzy question is have any of you had to deal with this problem?  If
> the networking and staffing permits, I think ideally we would want to add
> the scoping module and include this building as a second "branch" that has
> it's own circulation staff.  But if any of you have dealt with this and
> might have a different take, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael Carty
> Library Information Technology Specialist
> Loyola Marymount University
> One LMU Drive
> L.A., CA  90045-8200
> (310) 338-7584
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
>