[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2007 ]
[ Date index for 2007 ]
[ Author index for 2007 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 10:28:58 -0800
- From: "Wing, Robert" <robert.wing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: INNOPAC digest, Vol 1 #55 - 22 msgs
Here is another.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:23 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: INNOPAC digest, Vol 1 #55 - 22 msgs
Send INNOPAC mailing list submissions to
innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of INNOPAC digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Item records without linked bibs (Mieko Yamaguchi)
2. RE: Item records without linked bibs (CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx)
3. RE: security programs and Windows 2000 (James Howard)
4. RE: Millennium Displays (Howard Pasternack)
5. Re: Millennium Displays (Sandy Olson)
6. Re: In-house stats - circ. workflow
(Joanne_She_AT_JIS.ccmail@xxxxxxxxxx)
7. Public Services Librarian - Sonoma State University (Raye Lynn Thomas)
8. Re: Guicat freezing (Penny Swanson)
9. RE: Determining the receipt printers output
(CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx)
10. Patron email address field (Jonathan Jiras)
11. RE: Patron email address field (CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx)
12. Re: Patron email address field (Mieko Yamaguchi)
13. Re: Patron email address field (James Grant)
14. Sorting in Course Reserves (Bonnie Sgarro)
15. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (Sue Cody)
16. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (CAROLYN ROKKE)
17. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (CAROLYN ROKKE)
18. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (CAROLYN ROKKE)
19. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (CAROLYN ROKKE)
20. Re: Sorting in Course Reserves (CAROLYN ROKKE)
21. Apologies (CAROLYN ROKKE)
22. Interfacing with other campus depts. such as bursar (Berger, Marianne
C.)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 12:04:36 +0000
From: Mieko Yamaguchi <m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Item records without linked bibs
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I'm prepared to be corrected, but I thought item records could not exist
on INNOPAC without being attached to a bib record. We had orphan item
records on our previous system and had to pay Innovative good money to have
them loaded (attached to suppressed bibs) because we had not realised that
item data without bibs (i.e. without a 245 field) would be rejected during
the initial load.
If you do have items not attached to a bib in your database how about
creating a list of all items and sorting by the record number of linked
bib records: s (sort) ? (other types) b (bib) 9 (record no.) Those
without linked bibs should appear at the beginning of the list.
"Davey ,Mr Paul" wrote:
> I know how to compile a review file of bib records with no linked items,
but
> how can I compile a list of item records with no linked bibs?
Mieko
--
Mieko Yamaguchi | Email: mieko@xxxxxxxxxx
Tech Services Manager/System Coordinator | Phone: +44 (0)1248 382970
University of Wales Bangor | Fax: +44 (0)1248 382979
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Item records without linked bibs
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:20:09 -0500
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Mieko -- You are absolutely correct that items should NEVER exist
without being attached to a bib record. The same could be said for
checkins and orders. If you have items that are "orphans", this
represents a problem and may probably require a helping hand from the
good folks in Emeryville.
If you think there are a number of cases in your system where there are
items with no bibs, I would open a call with the item record number.
Best -- Corey
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Corey Seeman
Assistant Professor, Assistant Dean for Library Systems
University of Toledo (MS# 509)
Toledo, Ohio 43606-3399
corey.seeman@xxxxxxxxxx
(419) 530-2333
(419) 530-2726 (fax)
http://www.cl.utoledo.edu/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----Original Message-----
From: Mieko Yamaguchi [mailto:m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:05 AM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Item records without linked bibs
I'm prepared to be corrected, but I thought item records could not exist
on INNOPAC without being attached to a bib record. We had orphan item
records on our previous system and had to pay Innovative good money to
have
them loaded (attached to suppressed bibs) because we had not realised
that
item data without bibs (i.e. without a 245 field) would be rejected
during
the initial load.
If you do have items not attached to a bib in your database how about
creating a list of all items and sorting by the record number of linked
bib records: s (sort) ? (other types) b (bib) 9 (record no.) Those
without linked bibs should appear at the beginning of the list.
"Davey ,Mr Paul" wrote:
> I know how to compile a review file of bib records with no linked
items, but
> how can I compile a list of item records with no linked bibs?
Mieko
--
Mieko Yamaguchi | Email: mieko@xxxxxxxxxx
Tech Services Manager/System Coordinator | Phone: +44 (0)1248 382970
University of Wales Bangor | Fax: +44 (0)1248 382979
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: "James Howard" <jlhoward@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: security programs and Windows 2000
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 07:12:32 -0600
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
We have installed both Fortress and Secure Pc at one time or another.
Fortress simply cause havoc with our microsoft office suite. The
computer would simply restart without warning. This made us think we
were going crazy until FINALLY we got Fortress to confess. They sent us
a patch, but we never tried to implement. By that time we had moved to
Secure PC.
Secure PC works well with w2k and we have experience anything
catastrophic. However, I've noticed that it does not work as well as it
does on W98. There are some features that we doubt their effectiveness
on W2k and then when we run it on W98, it works fine. I think a lot of
companies developed their products for W99/98. Hopefully, now that there
is no 95/98/ME (Praise be!) they will move toward 2000/xp.
One think I like about Secure PC is that you can have a different
security profile for different logins so we can have a children's
security profile and an adult. In our case the only difference is
children's does not allow access to the a drive.
Used in conjunction with Public Browser we've been quite happy with
Secure PC.
-----Original Message-----
From: innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Ossi
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 2:46 PM
To: Innopac Users Group
Subject: security programs and Windows 2000
Has anyone successfully installed security programs on public access
computer running Windows 2000, and IE 5.5 or IE6 browser? Which
programs did you use and would you recommend them to others?
Thanks in advance.
Kathy
Kathy J. Ossi
Automation Librarian
Williamson County Public Library
611 West Main Street
Franklin, TN 37064
615.595.1241
fax 615.595.1245
http://lib.williamson-tn.org
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx Update your subscription
options: http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 09:54:16 -0500
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
From: Howard Pasternack <Howard_Pasternack@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Millennium Displays
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Is there something different about Millennium in W2K. I use it in 98se
with 800x600 resolution and small fonts with no problems. All the modules
display fine. And the standard windows sizing techniques apply. -- Howard
At 03:05 PM 10/31/01 -0800, you wrote:
>We are unhappy about this, too, for the same reasons. The program needs
>more work on display, including wheel mouse support.
>Roy Hunter
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Maurine McCourry
>Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:26 PM
>To: 'innopac@xxxxxxxxxx'
>Cc: Dan Joldersma (E-mail); Dan Knoch (E-mail); Linda Moore (E-mail);
>Martha Spicuzza (E-mail)
>Subject: Millennium Displays
>
>
>I've searched the IUG list archives and haven't found a specific answer to
>this question, so I thought I'd post it now. We have recently had all of
>the Millennium modules installed, have had some training on them, and are
in
>the process of integrating their use into our normal workflows. We've
>noticed that many of the windows in Millennium are too big for our screens,
>causing important selection boxes, etc., to be invisible without a great
>deal of manipulation. I've had several conversations with the help desk
>about this, and it sounds like the only solution for this problem is to
>change our screen resolutions from 800x600 to 1024x768. This will solve
the
>problem in Millennium, but will cause new problems in every other program
we
>use. We are using Windows 2000 on 17" monitors, and we're on Release 2001.
>Has anyone else run into this problem, or are we unusual in our standard
use
>of the lower resolution? I don't think any of us on this rather small
staff
>has perfect eyesight, which may be a part of our problem, but I'm sure
we're
>not alone in that. I have tried selecting "large fonts" instead of the
>normal "small" when the higher resolution is selected, but the display in
>many programs remains less than ideal, and I dread the thought of making
>adjustments to every application individually.
>
>Thanks in advance for any advice anyone may be able to offer.
>
>Maurine McCourry
>Technical Services Librarian
>Hillsdale College
>maurine.mccourry@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
>Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
>Update your subscription options:
>http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
>--
>This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
>Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
>Update your subscription options:
>http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: "Sandy Olson" <SandyO@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: University of Central Arkansas
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 09:12:19 -0600
Subject: Re: Millennium Displays
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I had this same problem, and changing the screen resolution made all
the difference. I haven't noticed any problems in any of the other
software I use. My eyesight is not the greatest either, but I have
encountered no problems.
Sandy
From: Maurine McCourry <Maurine.McCourry@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'innopac@xxxxxxxxxx'"
<innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Copies to: "Dan Joldersma (E-mail)"
<Dan.Joldersma@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Dan Knoch (E-mail)" <Dan.Knoch@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Linda Moore (E-mail)"
<Linda.Moore@xxxxxxxxxx>,
"Martha Spicuzza (E-mail)"
<Martha.Spicuzza@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Millennium Displays
Send reply to: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
<mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
Date sent: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:26:19 -0500
> I've searched the IUG list archives and haven't found a specific answer to
> this question, so I thought I'd post it now. We have recently had all of
> the Millennium modules installed, have had some training on them, and are
in
> the process of integrating their use into our normal workflows. We've
> noticed that many of the windows in Millennium are too big for our
screens,
> causing important selection boxes, etc., to be invisible without a great
> deal of manipulation. I've had several conversations with the help desk
> about this, and it sounds like the only solution for this problem is to
> change our screen resolutions from 800x600 to 1024x768. This will solve
the
> problem in Millennium, but will cause new problems in every other program
we
> use. We are using Windows 2000 on 17" monitors, and we're on Release
2001.
> Has anyone else run into this problem, or are we unusual in our standard
use
> of the lower resolution? I don't think any of us on this rather small
staff
> has perfect eyesight, which may be a part of our problem, but I'm sure
we're
> not alone in that. I have tried selecting "large fonts" instead of the
> normal "small" when the higher resolution is selected, but the display in
> many programs remains less than ideal, and I dread the thought of making
> adjustments to every application individually.
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice anyone may be able to offer.
>
> Maurine McCourry
> Technical Services Librarian
> Hillsdale College
> maurine.mccourry@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
> Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
Sandra Olson
Acquisitions Supervisor
Torreyson Library
University of Central Arkansas
sandyo@xxxxxxxxxx
501-450-5210
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: Joanne_She_AT_JIS.ccmail@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: In-house stats - circ. workflow
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:59:46 -0500
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Hi, John,
I think there are some codes in the system that you could use to fit your
needs, such as "in use", please check!
**********************************************************************
Joanne She
Head of Technical Services
Maryland State Law Library
Courts of Appeal Building
361 Rowe Boulevard
Annapolis, MD 21401-1697
(410)-260-1430 Fax 410-974-2063
**********************************************************************
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: In-house stats - circ. workflow
Author: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx (innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx)
at MDCOURTS
Date: 10/30/2001 11:53 AM
Our Circ. staff are interested in beginning to use the "Count
In-Library
Use" function. We are interested in counting Items that get
returned to the
Circ. Desk for reshelving, but have not been checked out.
All items returned to the Desk get scanned for "Check-In." We
were hoping
that an internal use Item field could be automatically
incremented for those
items "not checked out". Unless I'm wrong, it appears this is
not a system
option.
Instead, it appears that those "not checked out " items have to
be scanned
again under C,A,I - ( I > Count IN-LIBRARY use ). Is this how
it works? If
so, does anyone have any work-arounds or special workflow for
scanning in
batches for Counting In-Library Use? Or, would automatic
in-house counting
during checkin (as an enhancement) be more desirable?
Thank for your thoughts,
John
===================================
John Dillon jdillon@xxxxxxxxxx
Geisel Library
Saint Anselm College http://www.anselm.edu
100 Saint Anselm Drive Fax: (603) 641-7345
Manchester, NH 03102 Ph: (603) 641-7349
===================================
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group
INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:01:27 -0800
From: Raye Lynn Thomas <thomasra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Public Services Librarian - Sonoma State University
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Join us at one of the most dynamic learning facilities in Northern
California! The University Library in the Jean and Charles Schulz
Information Center at Sonoma State University, located in the beautiful win=
e
country, is the newest, most innovative library in the area. Opened in
August 2000, the library hosts a variety of amenities including an Automate=
d
Retrieval System, wireless technology, and a beautiful environment. The
Library is dedicated to the intellectual development of students and plays =
a
highly visible role on campus.
We are seeking an outgoing, innovative professional with outstanding public
service and leadership skills. This is a library in which ideas and
collegiality flourish, and librarians truly make a difference in the
education of students.
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
o Assist students, faculty, staff, local K-12 students and the community
with
research and reference at an active reference desk.
o Provide information competence instructional offerings, and assist with
program planning and evaluation.
o Manage special projects in support of user services.
QUALIFICATIONS:
o Master of Library or Information Science from an A.L.A. accredited
institute (or equivalent).
o Strong communication skills in both individual and group settings
o An enthusiastic and dynamic approach to integrating new technology with
traditional methods of learning and research; and receptivity to new ideas
for library services.
o Experience providing general and specialized reference with emphasis on
electronic reference resources and the Internet.
o Demonstrated ability to take initiative, as well as to work
collaboratively.
RANK AND SALARY: Appointment will be at the rank of Senior Assistant
Librarian, salary range of $45,000-$50,000, commensurate with qualification=
s
and experience.
Review of applications begins January 2, 2002 for applications postmarked b=
y
that date until acceptance of the position by a qualified candidate; if no
appointment has been made, another review of applications postmarked by
January 31, 2002 will be conducted.
To apply, submit a letter of application stating your interest and
experience; a complete and current resum=E9; and names, addresses, email
addresses, and telephone numbers of three references to:
Raye Lynn Thomas, Chair, Search Committee
University Library, Jean and Charles Schulz Information Center
1801 E. Cotati Ave.
Rohnert Park, CA 94928-3609
(707) 664-2951, fax: (707) 664-4095, email: thomasra@xxxxxxxxxx
(707) 664-2958 (TDD for Voice and Hearing Impaired Only)
Please refer to search number 000085 on all correspondence. Before applyin=
g
please review the complete position description at: http://www.sonoma.edu/
facaffairs/tenure_track.html
Sonoma State University is an affirmative action, equal opportunity
employer.
--__--__--
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 09:17:33 -0800
From: "Penny Swanson" <swansonp@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Guicat freezing
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Many thanks to all those who replied to my query on Guicat problems. I've =
gotten some good ideas, and am now analyzing them. I think everyone =
replied to the list, so won't summarize unless someone wants me to. =
When/if we find a solution, I will post to the list.
One good idea was to keep track of the circumstances of each crash and =
pool information. I am going to ask my staff to keep more detailed logs =
beginning today and will share this with anyone else who is working on =
this. Please send me a message off list so I can have your e-mail =
address.
An initial idea that I had concerns the use of control keys to issue =
commands, instead of clicking buttons. Maybe it is just coincidence, but =
the person who experiences the most crashes dislikes using the mouse and =
so uses the alternative control key combinations to issue most commands. =
Does anyone else use this method? What are your experiences?
Thanks again for all the great help.
Penny
~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^
Penny Swanson
Technical Services Librarian
Douglas College Library
P.O. Box 2503=20
New Westminster, B. C.
Canada V3L 5B2
(604) 527-5259
FAX: 527-5193
swansonp@xxxxxxxxxx
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Determining the receipt printers output
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:36:21 -0500
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Folks -- I was COMPLETELY WRONG ABOUT THIS ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After tinkering with my system, with some very helpful assistance from
Innovative, and I found that Milcirc was actually paying closer
attention to the details than I thought!
The two lines of text that can be added to receipt printing (on a
login-by-login basis) can be entered only if you system is setup to
print date due slips! (Makes sense, certainly). On our system, we had
Circulation Option #12 set to NEVER:
12 > Check-out: Print date due
slips.....................................NEVER
When Milcirc reads the system options, it does not gray out the options
boxes, but instead does not even show them at all in the printing tab of
the login manager. I changed the system option to ASK and sure enough,
when I went back into Milcirc, I was presented with the wonderful
opportunity to add the two lines for the receipts.
I thought someone from the helpdesk told me that it did not make the cut
for Release 2001, but apparently I was wrong about that.
Sorry for the confusion.
Corey
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Corey Seeman
Assistant Professor, Assistant Dean for Library Systems
University of Toledo (MS# 509)
Toledo, Ohio 43606-3399
corey.seeman@xxxxxxxxxx
(419) 530-2333
(419) 530-2726 (fax)
http://www.cl.utoledo.edu/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----Original Message-----
From: CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:53 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Determining the receipt printers output
Gene -- The element that lets you add two lines of text (on a
login-by-login basis) was supposed to be for Release 2001, but it did
not get finished in time. I am sure that it will be around shortly and
think that it will be really fantastic, especially for consortiums that
have many different phone numbers, etc. I am not sure about the logos
and the like.
Best -- Corey
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Kenney [mailto:gkenney@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:38 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Determining the receipt printers output
Corey,
Thanks, for your reply. This is good to know. I was mislead to believe
that you could have the receipt printer print out your logo, and special
messages along with the III data.
Thanks, again,
Gene
From: CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Determining the receipt printers output
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: innopac-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
X-BeenThere: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
List-Help: <mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Subscribe: <http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac>,
<mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac.innopacusers.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac>,
<mailto:innopac-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://innopacusers.org/list/private/innopac/>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:36:14 -0500
Status:
Gene --
Right now, there is relatively little that you can set in regards to the
output of receipt printers. What you can set (namely the number of
lines between receipts for books) is in line 17 of the Circulation
Options screen of Set System Options (Release 2001 users manual page #
101917). You might also want to Page # 102204 (Release 2001), which
provides the overview of the Date Due Slips.
Best -- Corey
PS -- Happy Halloween!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Corey Seeman
Assistant Professor, Assistant Dean for Library Systems
University of Toledo (MS# 509)
Toledo, Ohio 43606-3399
corey.seeman@xxxxxxxxxx
(419) 530-2333
(419) 530-2726 (fax)
http://www.cl.utoledo.edu/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Kenney [mailto:gkenney@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:45 PM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Determining the receipt printers output
I am looking for the place in milcirc, or the character-based where I
can
set-up what is printed on my receipt printers (Star Micronics TSP2043
thermal printers). Right now, when I print a patrons' checked items,
only
the barcodes,
and call numbers are printed. I would also like to change the number of
linefeeds between each line of printout.
Thanks,
************************************************************************
Gene Kenney
Electronic Services &
Assistant System Administrator
Bethel College Library & Seminaries
3900 Bethel Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55112
ph: 651-635-8733 Success is to be measured not so much by the
fax: 651-635-1971 position that one has reached in life as by the
gkenney@xxxxxxxxxx obstacles which he has overcome while trying
http://library.bethel.edu to succeed. Booker T. Washington
************************************************************************
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
************************************************************************
Gene Kenney
Electronic Services &
Assistant System Administrator
Bethel College Library & Seminaries
3900 Bethel Drive
St. Paul, Minnesota 55112
ph: 651-635-8733 Success is to be measured not so much by the
fax: 651-635-1971 position that one has reached in life as by the
gkenney@xxxxxxxxxx obstacles which he has overcome while trying
http://library.bethel.edu to succeed. Booker T. Washington
************************************************************************
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:44:04 -0500
From: Jonathan Jiras <jjjwml@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Patron email address field
To: INNOPAC List <INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Hello Innovative folks:
Does anyone know how to create a report that will find invalid email
addresses.
For example, I want to create a list of all patron records that don't
have
a "@" or "." in the email address.
How do I write that as a regular expression?
-Jon
--__--__--
Message: 11
From: CSeeman@xxxxxxxxxx
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Patron email address field
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 15:21:52 -0500
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Jonathan --
The trick to conducting this search is to remember that not only should
the patron email field not have the "@" or a ".", but that it also
exists. As a test, I just searched for EMAIL ADDR does not have "@" and
I received all sorts of records where the EMAIL ADDR did not have
anything!
I would construct the search as follows:
EMAIL ADDR "~" (does not equal) <nothing> AND EMAIL ADDR "x" does not
have "@" (using option 2, any field)
OR
EMAIL ADDR "~" (does not equal) <nothing> AND EMAIL ADDR "x" does not
have "."
You will see--
Find PATRON records that satisfy the following conditions
EMAIL ADDR <> AND EMAIL ADDR does not have @
OR EMAIL ADDR <> AND EMAIL ADDR does not have .
This should do the trick. My batting average has not been great lately!
Best -- Corey
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Corey Seeman
Assistant Professor, Assistant Dean for Library Systems
University of Toledo (MS# 509)
Toledo, Ohio 43606-3399
corey.seeman@xxxxxxxxxx
(419) 530-2333
(419) 530-2726 (fax)
http://www.cl.utoledo.edu/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Jiras [mailto:jjjwml@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:44 PM
To: INNOPAC List
Subject: Patron email address field
Hello Innovative folks:
Does anyone know how to create a report that will find invalid email
addresses.
For example, I want to create a list of all patron records that don't
have
a "@" or "." in the email address.
How do I write that as a regular expression?
-Jon
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 20:27:44 +0000 (GMT)
From: Mieko Yamaguchi <iss053@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: INNOPAC List <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patron email address field
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Why use regular expressions when a boolean search will do?
Have you tried
Find PATRON records that satisfy the following conditions
EMAIL ADDR <> AND EMAIL ADDR does not have @
OR EMAIL ADDR <> AND EMAIL ADDR does not have .
The second condition will only find addresses with no "." at all.
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Jonathan Jiras wrote:
> Does anyone know how to create a report that will find invalid email
> addresses.
>
> For example, I want to create a list of all patron records that don't
> have
> a "@" or "." in the email address.
>
> How do I write that as a regular expression?
Mieko
-----
Mieko Yamaguchi m.yamaguchi@xxxxxxxxxx
Technical Services Manager/System Coordinator +44 (0)1248 382970
Main Library, University of Wales Bangor, UK +44 (0)1248 382979 (Fax)
--__--__--
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:31:05 -0500
From: "James Grant" <jgrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patron email address field
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to
consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to
properly handle MIME multipart messages.
--=_366CE135.741568F7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
This is a little more than what you may have expected, but the way I did =
it was to export all of the email address from the PAC over to a text =
file. I then wrote a Perl script that checked each email and prints out =
the emails that are incorrect. Here is the logic:
if($email !~ /[\w\-]+\@[\w\-]+\.[\w\-]+/ ) {
print "$email\n";
}
That snippet of code should be placed in a loop to check each email =
address. =20
James E. Grant
Library Technology Paraprofessional
Fordham Law Library
140 W. 62nd St.
New York, NY 10023
212-636-6972 (voice)
212-636-7357 (fax)
>>> jjjwml@xxxxxxxxxx 11/01/01 02:44PM >>>
Hello Innovative folks:
Does anyone know how to create a report that will find invalid email
addresses.
For example, I want to create a list of all patron records that don't
have
a "@" or "." in the email address.
How do I write that as a regular expression?
-Jon
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC =
list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx=20
Update your subscription options: http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/inn=
opac
--=_366CE135.741568F7
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="James Grant.vcf"
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:James Grant
TEL;WORK:212 636-6972
ORG:;Law Library
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:JGRANT@xxxxxxxxxx
N:Grant;James
TITLE:Library Services Technician
END:VCARD
--=_366CE135.741568F7--
--__--__--
Message: 14
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 16:23:34 -0500
From: Bonnie Sgarro <sgarro@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------FB6992DCF1CDB2D105A7F314
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi all;
In the character-based system, when a patron pulls up titles for a
course reserve, it is possible to sort the list by title, author, or
call number. In the WebOPAC it doesn't seem possible to sort nohow. Am
I missing something, or has the functionality disappeared in WebOPAC?
Hoping to be enlightened.
Bonnie Sgarro
Cataloguing & Technical Services
Stevenson Library - Bard College
--------------FB6992DCF1CDB2D105A7F314
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="sgarro.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Bonnie Sgarro
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="sgarro.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Sgarro;Bonnie
tel;fax:845-758-5801
tel;work:845-758-7619
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Stevenson Library - Bard College
adr:;;;Annandale-on-Hudson;NY;12504;
version:2.1
email;internet:sgarro@xxxxxxxxxx
title:Cataloguing & Technical Services
x-mozilla-cpt:;-4352
fn:Bonnie Sgarro
end:vcard
--------------FB6992DCF1CDB2D105A7F314--
--__--__--
Message: 15
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 17:25:35 -0500
From: Sue Cody <codys@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I have found that if you are adding something or deleting something and
before quitting you sort (we typically sort by title) the sort works in the
WebOPAC, but if you don't actually change the list just going in a sorting
doesn't work.
At 04:23 PM 11/01/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi all;
>
>In the character-based system, when a patron pulls up titles for a
>course reserve, it is possible to sort the list by title, author, or
>call number. In the WebOPAC it doesn't seem possible to sort nohow. Am
>I missing something, or has the functionality disappeared in WebOPAC?
>
>Hoping to be enlightened.
>
>Bonnie Sgarro
>Cataloguing & Technical Services
>Stevenson Library - Bard College
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\Eudora\Attach\sgarro.vcf"
>
Sue Cody
Associate University Librarian for Public Services
William Madison Randall Library
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
601 S. College Road
Wilmington, NC 28403-5616
910-962-7409 (voice)
910-962-3078 (fax)
codys@xxxxxxxxxx
--__--__--
Message: 16
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:30:14 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I will be away from the office from Friday, November 2, through Thursday =
November 8, attending both CLA and Internet Librarian conferences.
--__--__--
Message: 17
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:40:03 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I will be away from the office from Friday, November 2, through Thursday =
November 8, attending both CLA and Internet Librarian conferences.
--__--__--
Message: 18
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:48:54 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I will be away from the office from Friday, November 2, through Thursday =
November 8, attending both CLA and Internet Librarian conferences.
--__--__--
Message: 19
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:56:41 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I will be away from the office from Friday, November 2, through Thursday =
November 8, attending both CLA and Internet Librarian conferences.
--__--__--
Message: 20
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:06:07 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Sorting in Course Reserves
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
I will be away from the office from Friday, November 2, through Thursday =
November 8, attending both CLA and Internet Librarian conferences.
--__--__--
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 15:20:24 -0800
From: "CAROLYN ROKKE" <CROKKE@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Apologies
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I just received four copies of the auto reply I wrote for "out of office" =
- so I deleted that rule, and apologize for bothering you.
I tried to write it to exclude my listservs and obviously failed miserably!=
I'm just glad I caught it before leaving you to all start hating me in a =
few days.
Carolyn
Carolyn Rokke
Automation Program Manager
Sacramento Public Library
Sacramento, CA 95814
crokke@xxxxxxxxxx
--__--__--
Message: 22
From: "Berger, Marianne C." <Berger@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'innopac@xxxxxxxxxx'" <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Interfacing with other campus depts. such as bursar
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:17:09 -0600
Reply-To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Our campus is (finally) going to upgrade the computer programs used by other
departments such as student records, bursar, and accounting. Naturally we
are interested in something that will easily interface with the Innovative
system. If you are interfacing electronically with other departments, I
would love some feedback. Which programs have been a snap to work with or
which ones should we encourage our IT people to avoid?
Thanks for the advice.
Marianne Berger
Reference Librarian
College of DuPage Library
425 Fawell Blvd
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
(630) 942 2338
berger@xxxxxxxxxx
--__--__--
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
digest
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
End of INNOPAC Digest
Home
Mailing list