RE: MILACQ Question

["Weiskittel, Karen" <KWeiskit@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Anne 

This sounds like the same problem our consortium was having.  Try putting a
cdate (cataloging date) in your order record.  That solved our problem.  I
believe you can also set the system to automatically put in the cdate.  

Karen S. Weiskittel
Associate Director for Technical Services
Northwest Vista College LRC
3535 North Ellison Drive
San Antonio, TX  78251-4217
Voice: (210) 348-2065   Fax: (210) 348-2064
Email: kweiskit@xxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-innopac@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Walsh, Anne
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 4:22 PM
To: 'INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: MILACQ Question


We have completed GuiCat, Milacq and MilSer training and the staff person
who is using MilAcq is having alot of problems using it, I dont know if it
is the system, the way it was taught or the persons understanding of the
system.
Anyway since I an not an expert on Milacq I thought one of you may be able
to help me answer this question.

>   As a test I ordered a few titles on Milacq, (they are real titles that I
> ordered on my present Access system).  On Friday, a title (2 copies,  test
> ordered at different times)  was received and so I went to Milacq to enter
> as "Received" on both.  
> On the OPAC, it showed 1 copy as "in process" and 1 copy still "on order".
> Question:  why are "in process" and "on order" still there if they were
> entered as received?  
> Have I done something wrong or missed out some steps.  I even created an
> item for one copy.   
> By the way, do I need to create an item each time I received a title, (per
> my notes, there are 3 ways to receive, one way was to create an item)"
> 
Thanks in advance for any guidance.
Cheers
Anne Walsh"

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Anne Walsh  B.Sc., MLIS
Information Analyst
anne.walsh@xxxxxxxxxx
604-528-3216
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list.
Private replies:  "Walsh, Anne" <Anne.Walsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list.
Private replies:  "Weiskittel, Karen" <KWeiskit@xxxxxxxxxx>
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/