[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
John,

This might help, but I'm not totally clear on your routing at the Rio Rancho
lib.
Are the current PCs in the Rio Rancho Lib. on the same subnet as the City?
For example, all PCs, both lib and city are 10.10.9.x. Or are they on
separate subnets, like 10.10.9.x and 10.10.7.x?
If they are on separate ones, you can add a batch file to the Windows
Startup in the machines that need access to the server that contains a line
like this
:
route add 192.168.2.10 10.10.9.1 ( use your own IPs)

Call it addroute.bat or something similar.
In my example, the 192.168.2.10 is the IP of the Millenium server, and the
10.10.9.1 is the ethernet interface on the router on the Rio Rancho Lib. end
of the T-1 to the server.
This way, the PCs stay on the 'City side' and yet, have a route to the
server.
If the router then is set to pass traffic from 10.10.9.0 to the ethernet
port 10.10.9.1,
only traffic from PCs on 10.10.9.x will get into that router and on to the
server. traffic from the City (10.10.7.x) will be ignored.
Of course, if there are multiple hosts to reach at the Albuquerque PL, then
you will need a separate line in the addroute.bat file to point at each one.
Like:
route add 192.168.2.10 10.10.9.1
route add 192.168.2.11 10.10.9.1
route add 192.168.2.12 10.10.9.1

Hope this helps, and feel free to communicate further off-list if you wish.

Mike

----- Original Message -----
From: <JMeier@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <innopac@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 10:51 AM
Subject: Network Access Question


> We are a Public Library (Albuquerque Public Library) using Innopac and in
> the process of moving to Millennium with eighteen branch libraries
> including one library (Rio Rancho Public Library) in a neighboring city
> which make us a consortium.  We have 6 class C licenses subnetted across
> all of the branch libraries including Rio Rancho Library. Rio Rancho uses
a
> class C subnet from us to access the Innopac through a terminal server and
> Wyse 55 VT devices over a T-1 line to our Main library for Circ, Acq,
> Cataloging, etc. They also have a separate class C subnet from the City of
> Rio Rancho. They use PC's to access their Novell network, the Internet and
> Administrative services on a T-1 line directly to City Hall in Rio Rancho.
> Now that we are moving to Millennium, they would like to replace the Wyse
> terminals at the circulation desk, Reference desk and the staff desks to
> access both systems. If they used the Rio Rancho IP subnet, we would have
> to put the IP address from their Firewall in our Limit Network Access
> table, which would give the City of Rio Ranch access to our system and we
> do not want to do that. If they used Albuquerque's IP subnet, Albuquerque
> would have access to Rio Rancho's network and they will not allow that. If
> anyone has any ideas on how to give Rio Rancho access to Albuquerque's
> system without compromising security please respond.
>
> Thank you!
>
> John Meier
> Albuquerque Public Library
> jmeier@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list.
> Private replies:  JMeier@xxxxxxxxxx
> Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list.
Private replies:  "Michael Sauvola" <msauvola@xxxxxxxxxx>
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/