RE: 11/28/00 IUG enhancements password

["Turner, Anne" <A.Turner@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I had always assumed that the enhancement requests were passworded so that competitors and prospective customers couldn't access them.
Certainly, our salesperson did not comply with my request to see customer enhancement requests.

Anne Turner
Sheffield Hallam University, UK

-----Original Message-----
From: cathy_cox@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cathy_cox@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 29 November 2000 04:55
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 11/28/00 IUG enhancements password


I have to admit, after the recent mishaps on the Innopacusers list relating to 
the enhancements passwords, I'm inclined to agree with Byron Mayes's post a 
couple of days ago about voting electronically.  If it is truly important to keep 
the password secret, so that only one person per institution has the ability to 
vote, then I think that completely electronic voting is not going to work as long 
as the same password is used to access the enhancements AND to vote.  Why not put 
the enhancements under consideration up on the CSdirect site, with Innovative's 
blessing, where anyone can review them - and then use the password to access the 
ballot ONLY?

Catherine Cox
Mission College

--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list.
Private replies:  cathy_cox@xxxxxxxxxx
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list.
Private replies:  "Turner, Anne" <A.Turner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/