[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
At 11:27 AM 7/24/00 -0700, you wrote:
>I cannot help but respond to this.  To change a 440 find to an 830 is a 
>total misunderstanding of MARC fields and what they stand for.  To change a 
>440 to a 490  1 and have an 830  which would read the very same thing is 
>totally wrong.
>
>The 440 field is totally valid. It means: This is the way item is described 
>in the book and is traced as such.  A 490 b1 means that is the way it is in 
>the book, but we are tracing it differently in an 8XX field.

But when the authorized form of the heading changes because of the
variations in title, the NACO participants change to series authority
records, or changes to AACR2 rules, then the 440 change to 490 1^ and an
830 addition is required. Otherwise you have a wrong reference.  In this
case, III is doing EXACTLY what should be done.  



Jeffrey A. Trimble
Asst. Catalog Librarian
Youngstown State University
Youngstown, OH
jtrimble@xxxxxxxxxx
(330) 742-2483
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list.
Private replies:  Jeffrey Trimble <jtrimble@xxxxxxxxxx>
Public replies:   INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Archives:  http://innopacusers.org/list/archives/