Re: Title mergers

["Amie S. Pifer" <Amie.S.Pifer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Virginia, I will do some manipulating.

Amie

Virginia Scheschy wrote:

> Amie,
>
> Our catalog label for the 785 field with a second indicator of 6 is -
> Split into.  This will appear in front of both titles and shouldn't be
> confusing.
>
> However, 785 with a second indicator of 7 is problematic.  Our catalog
> label displays as Merged with, which is correct for the first title but
> not for the second one.  I've copied below some text from our Procedures
> Manual, which shows the bib record label for the different indicators in
> the 780 and 785 fields, and the OCLC equivalent.  We are, unfortunately,
> limited by the number of characters allowed by the labels (12, I believe).
>
> Virginia
>
>        WOLFPAC Label            OCLC Designation
>        -------------            ----------------
> 780 00 Former title             Continues
>     01 Former title             Continues in part
>     02 Supersedes               Supersedes
>     03 Supersedes               Supersedes in part
>     04 Formed by                Formed by the union of __ and __
>     05 Absorbed                 Absorbed
>     06 Absorbed                 Absorbed in part
>     07 Former title             Separated from
>
> 785 00 Later title              Continued by
>     01 Later title              Continued in part by
>     02 Suprseded by             Superseded by
>     03 Suprseded by             Superseded in part by
>     04 Absorbed by              Absorbed by
>     05 Absorbed by              Absorbed in part by
>     06 Split into               Split into __ and __
>     07 Merged with              Merged with __ to form __
>     08 Later title              Changed back to
>
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Amie S. Pifer wrote:
>
> > Has anyone ever used the second indicator for a 785 of 6 or 7.  I know
> > that you must use to separate 785 entries (one of each of the merging
> > titles).  It is supposed to show up in the OPAC as: Merged with_______
> > to form ______.  When I do this it will show the "merged with" portion
> > but I cannot get it to show the "to form" portion.
> >
> > Can someone let me know if this is an innopac default or if the Bib
> > formats and standards manual is not up to date.
> > Amie Pifer
> >
begin:vcard 
n:Pifer;Amie S.
tel;work:517-774-3517
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Central Michigan University;Technical Services
adr:;;Park Library 105;Mt. Pleasant;MI;48859;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:Amie.S.Pifer@xxxxxxxxxx
title:Coordinator, Serials Operations
x-mozilla-cpt:;2912
fn:Amie S. Pifer
end:vcard